LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

This is a forum for newbies and beginners to post their first designs. Please note that this forum is only for Shipbucket and FD scale projects.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Rodondo
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#11 Post by Rodondo »

But imagine the recoil of the firing which would need a few feet of recoil back into the turret, that's going to make it very difficult
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards
furturewar
Posts: 25
Joined: March 11th, 2012, 6:31 am

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#12 Post by furturewar »

So should I make it a bit longer then?
Furturewarfare's Worklist:
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Titan-Class Carrier "King"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Objective Global Super-Warship Goliath "Ace of Aces"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Blitzker-Class Guided Missile Destroyer "Knight"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Lancer-Class Guided Missile Cruiser "Bishop"
-LRAM INC. Shipyards NAF Aegis-Class ASW/AAW Cruiser "Rook"

"We are the Aces of Aces, We fly high and fight to survive"
~Furturewarfare
Rodondo
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#13 Post by Rodondo »

No, just makes folding extremely difficult
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards
User avatar
SHIPDUDE
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#14 Post by SHIPDUDE »

Image

If you're shooting guided shells you shouldn't even bother with a turret!
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#15 Post by klagldsf »

furturewar wrote: I ran this through SpringSharp
...wut?

What I really want to know is how you've managed to avoid breaking SpringSharp with this thing.

Also thank you for introducing me to the OSV-96 which is quite possibly the stupidest real-life weapon I've ever seen. I have to wonder why the Russians didn't just copy the GM-6, which is not only a bullpup weapon (which makes it shorter right off the bat) but you just lock the barrel into full-recoil position for easy transport, making it maybe half the length of the OSV-96 when it's "folded".
Rodondo
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#16 Post by Rodondo »

SHIPDUDE wrote:Image

If you're shooting guided shells you shouldn't even bother with a turret!
What IS that?!
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#17 Post by Thiel »

You can't compare small arms and naval artillery. The forces, masses and pressures involved are so much greater that most of the construction methods used on small-arms simply don't work. In this case it's going to be impossible to get a tight seal between the barrel and the breach. Constructing a mechanism capable of folding the barrel is a major technical challenge in itself. And even then it's going to take a long time to fold and unfold. I wouldn't be surprised if either action takes an hour or more.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#18 Post by Zephyr »

furturewar wrote:Think of it like the Russian Sniper Rifle, the OSV-96. That barrel folds and fires just fine.
Where did you get the "expanding the hull" statement? I don't think i ever said anything about expanding the hull...
There is a significant difference between small arms and naval guns. That is about the same as comparing a fircracker to a 500Kg bomb.
And you already have "expanded the hull". You seem to think that taking a Zumwalt and making it 200+ meters long will yield identical results. No. That doesn't work.

This design is fundamentally unworkable. You say you ran it through springsharp and that it is "floatable". So? Driftwood is floatable, but that doesn't make it a warship.
Last edited by Zephyr on March 16th, 2012, 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#19 Post by Colosseum »

Think of it like the Russian Sniper Rifle, the OSV-96. That barrel folds and fires just fine.
Again comparing small arms to naval guns! I already told you it doesn't work!

I understand that you're 15 and by definition stupid, but come on.
User avatar
Demon Lord Razgriz
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina

Re: LRAM INC. Zweihander-Class Battleship

#20 Post by Demon Lord Razgriz »

Rodondo wrote:
SHIPDUDE wrote:Image

If you're shooting guided shells you shouldn't even bother with a turret!
What IS that?!
That is two 16" guns from the Iowas put together trying to lob cargo into orbit, designed & built by Gerald Bull in the US before he went to work for Ol' Saddam.
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series
Post Reply