Nihon Kaigun 1946
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
An excellent AU design, it looks just right. A very plausible Midway-analogue.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Since there are so many nicely-redone IJN parts available as of late, I thought I'd redo a certain monster. However, in revamping her, she's now EVEN LARGER. Only by 30 feet, but with a ship like this, 30 feet's a lot.
Shichido-class Battleship
Length: 1,299.5 feet
Armament: 15 x 20-inch main; 12 x 8-inch secondary; 20 x 3.9-inch tertiary; 112 x 40-mm. Bofors AA (28 twin mounts on either side)
Enjoy!
Shichido-class Battleship
Length: 1,299.5 feet
Armament: 15 x 20-inch main; 12 x 8-inch secondary; 20 x 3.9-inch tertiary; 112 x 40-mm. Bofors AA (28 twin mounts on either side)
Enjoy!
- heuhen
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
- Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
not big enough lol!
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Holy Topweight, Batman.
I'd rather do like what Navyfield does and have two of the fore turrets be on the same plane. Cut down the superstructure if it gets too long - even if it means sacrificing boilers and you have to live with sub-30 knot top speed.
I'd rather do like what Navyfield does and have two of the fore turrets be on the same plane. Cut down the superstructure if it gets too long - even if it means sacrificing boilers and you have to live with sub-30 knot top speed.
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Impressive. Although crazy.
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Great stuff! I really enjoy the whole thread.
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
I guess you could argue that's in keeping with a history of marginally-stable IJN ships ... Couldn't you get a better ship by removing 'C' turret, though, and bringing the 'D' turret (the secondary) down to that position - I realise it's a 20% cut in firepower but I'd guess the stability would merit it?
- Colombamike
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
- Location: France, Marseille
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Ship commissioned by february 1950 (late 1945-late 1949 built, this ship is so GIGANTIC that it consumes 2/3 of the ENTIRE Japanese military industrial 1946-1949 resources , only for 1 ship...).
Sunk April 7, 1950 by a U.S. nuclear attack (This gigantic battleship is a too tick/large armor (and a too extensive internal sub-division/compartmentalization) to be sunk by a conventional attack).
April 07, 1950 : In Kure harbor/anchorage, an American B-45 bomber (or a B-36 or a B-50 ?) drop a Mk-4 bomb (C pits type, 20-30 Kt yield) on this ship. The A-Bomb explode as a "near-miss" (65 meters east & 95 meters above the ship).
All exterior superstructures are torn/blown-down.
Due to this large size & armor, the hull-integrity of this ship is "almost" not deadly-affected, but the (global/general/extended) damage are so large that the entire (remaining) crew (in any case, all fatally contaminated) are forced to abandon the ship that will sink a few hours later (or in the best case, up to few days later...) in the bay.
Sunk April 7, 1950 by a U.S. nuclear attack (This gigantic battleship is a too tick/large armor (and a too extensive internal sub-division/compartmentalization) to be sunk by a conventional attack).
April 07, 1950 : In Kure harbor/anchorage, an American B-45 bomber (or a B-36 or a B-50 ?) drop a Mk-4 bomb (C pits type, 20-30 Kt yield) on this ship. The A-Bomb explode as a "near-miss" (65 meters east & 95 meters above the ship).
All exterior superstructures are torn/blown-down.
Due to this large size & armor, the hull-integrity of this ship is "almost" not deadly-affected, but the (global/general/extended) damage are so large that the entire (remaining) crew (in any case, all fatally contaminated) are forced to abandon the ship that will sink a few hours later (or in the best case, up to few days later...) in the bay.
Last edited by Colombamike on May 1st, 2014, 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Hi colombamike,
I'd thought that in this AU, America and Japan were at peace by that point (unless I'm getting my AUs mixed somewhere, I'd thought that in nihon kaigun, the war was over in '46). Could be I've misread somewhere in the 40-odd pages of stuff, but my understanding of this AU is that it'd be quite out of character for the US forces to turn on the Japanese forces by that point?
Ad
I'd thought that in this AU, America and Japan were at peace by that point (unless I'm getting my AUs mixed somewhere, I'd thought that in nihon kaigun, the war was over in '46). Could be I've misread somewhere in the 40-odd pages of stuff, but my understanding of this AU is that it'd be quite out of character for the US forces to turn on the Japanese forces by that point?
Ad
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
First off, in this AU, the USN and Japan are at peace from September 1946 onward, so this is irrelevant.Colombamike wrote:Ship commissioned by february 1950 (late 1945-late 1949 built, this ship is so GIGANTIC that it consumes 2/3 of the ENTIRE Japanese military industrial 1946-1949 resources , only for 1 ship...).emperor_andreas wrote:Shichido-class Battleship
Length: 1,299.5 feet; Armament: 15 x 20-inch main; 12 x 8-inch secondary; 20 x 3.9-inch tertiary; 112 x 40-mm. Bofors AA (28 twin mounts on either side)
Sunk April 7, 1950 by a U.S. nuclear attack (This gigantic battleship is a too tick/large armor (and a too extensive internal sub-division/compartmentalization) to be sunk by a conventional attack).
April 01, 1950 : In Kure harbor/anchorage, an American B-45 bomber (or a B-36 or a B-50 ?) drop a Mk-4 bomb (C pits type, 20-30 Kt yield) on this ship. The A-Bomb explode as a "near-miss" (65 meters east & 95 meters above the ship).
All exterior superstructures are torn/blown-down.
Due to this large size & armor, the hull-integrity of this ship is "almost" not deadly-affected, but the (global/general/extended) damage are so large that the entire (remaining) crew (in any case, all fatally contaminated) are forced to abandon the ship that will sink a few hours later (or in the best case, up to few days later...) in the bay.
Secondly, I think you completely missed the point of this being an AU, so I'll just refrain from commenting here and post anything I have on the Rant Thread.