Nihon Kaigun 1946

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Hood
Posts: 7234
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#421 Post by Hood »

An excellent AU design, it looks just right. A very plausible Midway-analogue.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
emperor_andreas
Posts: 3908
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#422 Post by emperor_andreas »

Since there are so many nicely-redone IJN parts available as of late, I thought I'd redo a certain monster. However, in revamping her, she's now EVEN LARGER. Only by 30 feet, but with a ship like this, 30 feet's a lot.

Shichido-class Battleship
Length: 1,299.5 feet
Armament: 15 x 20-inch main; 12 x 8-inch secondary; 20 x 3.9-inch tertiary; 112 x 40-mm. Bofors AA (28 twin mounts on either side)

Enjoy! :)

Image
Image
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#423 Post by heuhen »

not big enough lol!
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#424 Post by klagldsf »

Holy Topweight, Batman.

I'd rather do like what Navyfield does and have two of the fore turrets be on the same plane. Cut down the superstructure if it gets too long - even if it means sacrificing boilers and you have to live with sub-30 knot top speed.
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#425 Post by eswube »

Impressive. Although crazy. ;)
maomatic
Posts: 493
Joined: February 20th, 2014, 7:46 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#426 Post by maomatic »

Great stuff! I really enjoy the whole thread.
apdsmith
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#427 Post by apdsmith »

I guess you could argue that's in keeping with a history of marginally-stable IJN ships ... Couldn't you get a better ship by removing 'C' turret, though, and bringing the 'D' turret (the secondary) down to that position - I realise it's a 20% cut in firepower but I'd guess the stability would merit it?
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
Image
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695
User avatar
Colombamike
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#428 Post by Colombamike »

Ship commissioned by february 1950 (late 1945-late 1949 built, this ship is so GIGANTIC that it consumes 2/3 of the ENTIRE Japanese military industrial 1946-1949 resources :roll: , only for 1 ship...).

Sunk April 7, 1950 by a U.S. nuclear attack (This gigantic battleship is a too tick/large armor (and a too extensive internal sub-division/compartmentalization) to be sunk by a conventional attack).

April 07, 1950 : In Kure harbor/anchorage, an American B-45 bomber (or a B-36 or a B-50 ?) drop a Mk-4 bomb (C pits type, 20-30 Kt yield) on this ship. The A-Bomb explode as a "near-miss" (65 meters east & 95 meters above the ship).

All exterior superstructures are torn/blown-down.
Due to this large size & armor, the hull-integrity of this ship is "almost" not deadly-affected, but the (global/general/extended) damage are so large that the entire (remaining) crew (in any case, all fatally contaminated) are forced to abandon the ship that will sink a few hours later (or in the best case, up to few days later...) in the bay.
Last edited by Colombamike on May 1st, 2014, 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
apdsmith
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#429 Post by apdsmith »

Hi colombamike,

I'd thought that in this AU, America and Japan were at peace by that point (unless I'm getting my AUs mixed somewhere, I'd thought that in nihon kaigun, the war was over in '46). Could be I've misread somewhere in the 40-odd pages of stuff, but my understanding of this AU is that it'd be quite out of character for the US forces to turn on the Japanese forces by that point?

Ad
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
Image
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695
emperor_andreas
Posts: 3908
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#430 Post by emperor_andreas »

Colombamike wrote:
emperor_andreas wrote:Shichido-class Battleship
Length: 1,299.5 feet; Armament: 15 x 20-inch main; 12 x 8-inch secondary; 20 x 3.9-inch tertiary; 112 x 40-mm. Bofors AA (28 twin mounts on either side)Image
Ship commissioned by february 1950 (late 1945-late 1949 built, this ship is so GIGANTIC that it consumes 2/3 of the ENTIRE Japanese military industrial 1946-1949 resources :roll: , only for 1 ship...).

Sunk April 7, 1950 by a U.S. nuclear attack (This gigantic battleship is a too tick/large armor (and a too extensive internal sub-division/compartmentalization) to be sunk by a conventional attack).

April 01, 1950 : In Kure harbor/anchorage, an American B-45 bomber (or a B-36 or a B-50 ?) drop a Mk-4 bomb (C pits type, 20-30 Kt yield) on this ship. The A-Bomb explode as a "near-miss" (65 meters east & 95 meters above the ship).

All exterior superstructures are torn/blown-down.
Due to this large size & armor, the hull-integrity of this ship is "almost" not deadly-affected, but the (global/general/extended) damage are so large that the entire (remaining) crew (in any case, all fatally contaminated) are forced to abandon the ship that will sink a few hours later (or in the best case, up to few days later...) in the bay.
First off, in this AU, the USN and Japan are at peace from September 1946 onward, so this is irrelevant.

Secondly, I think you completely missed the point of this being an AU, so I'll just refrain from commenting here and post anything I have on the Rant Thread.
Image
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
Post Reply