dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#1 Post by acelanceloet »

Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
rd77
Posts: 219
Joined: November 2nd, 2010, 11:36 am
Location: The Hague, Netherlands

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#2 Post by rd77 »

Great stuff! I just read the other day that a yard has been selected (Hyundai in South Korea) and the vessel will be delivered in Q4 2012. Nice first drawing of this mammoth, based on what little info and drawings there currently are. As the vessel approaches delivery, I'm sure more details will emerge (such as: placement of anchors, radars, etc.)
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#3 Post by acelanceloet »

indeed. I doubt I have missed much though: there is simply no place for radars and such. maybe one on a small mast on the bridge, but as there is no detail about it and it would be in the way of the crane.......
I doubt anchors are really needed, but well..... the only other thing that misses are some navigation lights.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#4 Post by Novice »

This shouldn't be here, as it was not build yet, or am I wrong?
BTW a very nice drawing of a ship which in my eyes doesn't look so much as a ship.
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#5 Post by klagldsf »

acelanceloet wrote: I doubt anchors are really needed
That would imply this ship does two things: be docked, or be in a constant state of motion.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#6 Post by acelanceloet »

Novice wrote:This shouldn't be here, as it was not build yet, or am I wrong?
BTW a very nice drawing of a ship which in my eyes doesn't look so much as a ship.
she's ugly, but an cool concept, and she will be floating next year, so it is very likely that it will be build.....
and as the holland class OPV was already in the real designs section before they started building it as far as I know, so ......... but that raises a question: should 'future build' be submitted to 'never build' ?
klagldsf wrote:
acelanceloet wrote: I doubt anchors are really needed
That would imply this ship does two things: be docked, or be in a constant state of motion.
it will mostly be those 2..... and I have no idea where to place the anchors, as you can't add them to movable structures or mount them underwater, so the only place they could be placed is on the large structure, near the lifeboats. as far as I know, this would give as much problems as it would solve.......

btw, when do merchant ships use anchors these days? when they are waiting to enter an harbor, when they are waiting for something in general..... I don't see much use for them on a ship like this, but I can be wrong, of course.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#7 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

I would think that if the design is ordered for production that would justify it here. Its my own opinion, but 'Never Built' seems more suitable for projects that we can safetly confine to history.
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#8 Post by klagldsf »

acelanceloet wrote: and I have no idea where to place the anchors, as you can't add them to movable structures or mount them underwater, so the only place they could be placed is on the large structure, near the lifeboats. as far as I know, this would give as much problems as it would solve.......
Why?

And before you say anything, compare this picture:

Image

To this picture:

Image
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#9 Post by acelanceloet »

that corrects part of my assumption.... but still, you can see that the anchor winches are still above the waterline. so, you could say..... has an submarine an anchor? if that is possible, then I stand corrected :P
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: dockwise 'Type Zero' super semi-sub heavy lift transport

#10 Post by erik_t »

Modern submarines have flush-mount anchors in the cladding forward of the forward pressure bulkhead. Here is an example.
Post Reply