Shipbucket

Starting with the MRAV 660,



http://products.damen.com/en/ranges/mul ... vessel-660

Not bad at all. Nice detail in relation to the original drawing, the shape and proportions look correct, and on an original subject to boot.
I have only one nitpicky remark on the drawing, that the break lines on the hull side need not be that dark, as there are no visible lines on the 3D model and the change in shade could suffice to show the transition.

Regarding the ship itself, has it been actually built? The builder's website only shows 3D model pictures, is why I'm asking.

I would think if it hasn't yet been built properly, it will be soon. If it's a problem the thread can be moved.

As for the line, can you be more specific?

Sorry if that wasn't clear. By the lines, I mean the darker dividing lines between the different colored parts of the above-waterline hull. Changing the brightness according to hull angleis fine IMO and helps show the shape of the hull, but the 3D model doesn't show any kind of separation between the panels slanted at different angles.
IMO it would look a little bit better and understated without these lines to show the transition between the panels.

Those are <90 degree angle lines, they're required since the hull is not rounded.

Unless they have a buyer then it belongs in never built designs.

And here's the MRAV 1600



http://products.damen.com/en/ranges/mul ... essel-1600

Very nice work and nicely drawn.

And finally, the MRAV 3600,



http://products.damen.com/en/ranges/mul ... essel-3600

Thiel wrote:Unless they have a buyer then it belongs in never built designs.

Yes they should be in never built designs.