Improved Type 22 + 23 Frigates
Posted: June 22nd, 2014, 9:26 pm
First off a little background fluff.
The Type 23 frigate is by far and away one of my all time favourite warships and as such any schemes of improvement or modifications to them I follow with great interest. I've been looking at the early 1990s proposals for "super" versions of the class ranging from sticking ASTER and SAMPSON (or what was to become ASTER and SAMPSON) onto a lengthened Type 23 hull to more modest proposals. (See Secret Projects forums).
I finally settled on a medley of the various concepts in the same vein but to my own ends. As such the following illustration belongs firmly here and not in the NW section...
The existing proposals to 'improve' the class seem to have all lengthened the ships without altering any of the other dimensions, to me a 10m plug in something like the T23 is quite a hefty plug to just add in without modifying any other dimensions... RP1 I believe was sceptical of the idea in the first place?
So on these I've taken it upon myself to increase both the overall beam and draught slightly by my (completely un-mathematical) method of going from the length:beam ratio and dividing by 3. With the lengthened hull that gives me 17.310m oa. beam and 5.77m depth (to the prop tips).
With regards to combat systems and sensors I'm pretty rusty on British systems despite being one... The proposals for NAAWS and FAAMS were the base for my set up. I decided upon the then tried and tested RIM-66 over NAAWS and FAAMS with RIM-7 standing in for Sea Wolf in the point defence role. The exact mix of missiles I'm not sure on. Suffice to say there is a 32 cell tactical-length Mk41 sitting in the hull (I'm guesstimating here on NAAWS/FAAMS requirements)
The gun as in the proposals is an FMC 5" Mk.45 capable of firing the laser-guided "Deadeye" round (before its cancellation). The existing 4.5" Mk.VIII is there as an option.
Medium-calibre weaponry is covered by a pair of DS30 mounts with 30mm x173 Mauser MK30s in them. Small-calibre weaponry that is actually permanently mounted consists of a pair of .50 HMGs amidships. There are however spigots for further .50 and smaller calibre weapons as the need arises.
CIWS, which is a first for the T23 comes in the form of a pair of (rather expensive and bulky) Goalkeepers amidships P&S.
SSMs are currently RGM-84s though as the proposals mention could be swapped for MM39/40s
Aviation facilities may from the extra beam with a slightly wider hangar but nothing much. Embarked helicopters would either be WG.13s or AW101s.
The sensor fit is as the actual T23s with the exception of fire control which replaces the existing Marconi Sea Wolf directors with Signaal / Thales STIR 2.4 / 240s for SM guidance.
Propulsion wise I've been wondering to myself about the notion of a regenerative-cycle Spey derivative as the WR-21 only earlier if that is there's actually room for the RC gear above the turbines. I'd be hoping to get >20MW out of them rather than the ~18MW they currently provide.
New diesel sets would be replace the Valentas, namely Ruston 6KR270 series sets. Rated at ~1900kW ea.
All things considered, although slightly beamier with greater installed power would it be unreasonable to look for 30 knots sustained out of them?
Type 22 Batch 4 - Improved Broadsword
Type 23 Batch 2 - Large Duke
Type 23 Batch 3 - Quiet Duke
Tol Galen Models
New England Models
MLU + SLEP A
To Be Revised
MLU + SLEP B
To Be Revised
Proposed LCS Modification
To Be Revised
~Regards, Mark.
The Type 23 frigate is by far and away one of my all time favourite warships and as such any schemes of improvement or modifications to them I follow with great interest. I've been looking at the early 1990s proposals for "super" versions of the class ranging from sticking ASTER and SAMPSON (or what was to become ASTER and SAMPSON) onto a lengthened Type 23 hull to more modest proposals. (See Secret Projects forums).
I finally settled on a medley of the various concepts in the same vein but to my own ends. As such the following illustration belongs firmly here and not in the NW section...
The existing proposals to 'improve' the class seem to have all lengthened the ships without altering any of the other dimensions, to me a 10m plug in something like the T23 is quite a hefty plug to just add in without modifying any other dimensions... RP1 I believe was sceptical of the idea in the first place?
So on these I've taken it upon myself to increase both the overall beam and draught slightly by my (completely un-mathematical) method of going from the length:beam ratio and dividing by 3. With the lengthened hull that gives me 17.310m oa. beam and 5.77m depth (to the prop tips).
With regards to combat systems and sensors I'm pretty rusty on British systems despite being one... The proposals for NAAWS and FAAMS were the base for my set up. I decided upon the then tried and tested RIM-66 over NAAWS and FAAMS with RIM-7 standing in for Sea Wolf in the point defence role. The exact mix of missiles I'm not sure on. Suffice to say there is a 32 cell tactical-length Mk41 sitting in the hull (I'm guesstimating here on NAAWS/FAAMS requirements)
The gun as in the proposals is an FMC 5" Mk.45 capable of firing the laser-guided "Deadeye" round (before its cancellation). The existing 4.5" Mk.VIII is there as an option.
Medium-calibre weaponry is covered by a pair of DS30 mounts with 30mm x173 Mauser MK30s in them. Small-calibre weaponry that is actually permanently mounted consists of a pair of .50 HMGs amidships. There are however spigots for further .50 and smaller calibre weapons as the need arises.
CIWS, which is a first for the T23 comes in the form of a pair of (rather expensive and bulky) Goalkeepers amidships P&S.
SSMs are currently RGM-84s though as the proposals mention could be swapped for MM39/40s
Aviation facilities may from the extra beam with a slightly wider hangar but nothing much. Embarked helicopters would either be WG.13s or AW101s.
The sensor fit is as the actual T23s with the exception of fire control which replaces the existing Marconi Sea Wolf directors with Signaal / Thales STIR 2.4 / 240s for SM guidance.
Propulsion wise I've been wondering to myself about the notion of a regenerative-cycle Spey derivative as the WR-21 only earlier if that is there's actually room for the RC gear above the turbines. I'd be hoping to get >20MW out of them rather than the ~18MW they currently provide.
New diesel sets would be replace the Valentas, namely Ruston 6KR270 series sets. Rated at ~1900kW ea.
All things considered, although slightly beamier with greater installed power would it be unreasonable to look for 30 knots sustained out of them?
Type 22 Batch 4 - Improved Broadsword
Type 23 Batch 2 - Large Duke
Type 23 Batch 3 - Quiet Duke
Tol Galen Models
New England Models
MLU + SLEP A
To Be Revised
MLU + SLEP B
To Be Revised
Proposed LCS Modification
To Be Revised
~Regards, Mark.