HII LPD-17 derived BMD platform
Posted: April 9th, 2013, 9:28 am
I'm just doing a link to the article because getting the formatting exactly correct would be a pain and a half.
It's a rail gun, but that's noted in the text.Colombamike wrote:- Hmmm, the forward gun look disproportionate for a 5"/62 on a LPD 17 hull (except if the american make a return to the 1970's era 8"/55 Mk 71 )
21 foot S-Band faces, again noted in the text.Colombamike wrote:- The phased array radar is probably the larger version of the AMDR (20 or 20 feet diameter ?)
Yes, for close in work, also noted in the text.Colombamike wrote:- I look one bofor 57mm/70 Mk 3 aft the after funnel/uptake
Yes, two Mk 49 launchers. Noted in the text.Colombamike wrote:- I count 2 CIWS RAM (one atop the forward bridge, one aft the after funnel/uptake)
Sometimes it's nice to be able to sustain an engagement. This is a stupid critique, especially as the fleet continues to shrink.Colombamike wrote:- I count 2 allay of VLS launchers ( 2 x 9 groups of 16 VLS each, for a grand total of...288 VLS) => Dangerous to put too many VLS on one ship, Dangerous to "put all your eggs in one basket"
Stupid, no, it's just a "fondamental strategy" => "not put all your eggs in one basket".... (but apparently you can not understand)TimothyC wrote:Sometimes it's nice to be able to sustain an engagement. This is a stupid critique, especially as the fleet continues to shrink.Colombamike wrote:- I count 2 allay of VLS launchers ( 2 x 9 groups of 16 VLS each, for a grand total of...288 VLS) => Dangerous to put too many VLS on one ship, Dangerous to "put all your eggs in one basket"
Would you like to tone down the arrogance a bit, or would you like a vacation?Colombamike wrote:Stupid, no, it's just a "fondamental strategy" => "not put all your eggs in one basket".... (but apparently you can not understand)TimothyC wrote:Sometimes it's nice to be able to sustain an engagement. This is a stupid critique, especially as the fleet continues to shrink.Colombamike wrote:- I count 2 allay of VLS launchers ( 2 x 9 groups of 16 VLS each, for a grand total of...288 VLS) => Dangerous to put too many VLS on one ship, Dangerous to "put all your eggs in one basket"
Typically a American answer "I want a big gun, I want big arms, I have a big penis".
Especially with $ 16 trillion US debt (20 to 24 in 2020...), Installs 10% of all your VLS on a single ship....argh !!!
On the contrary, not only would it mean having one ship being able to do the job of two (not much smaller) ships (and therefore have to spread less manpower around the fleet, which is the big issue), but it also means there won't be any question that it won't run dry before it can take full advantage of AEGIS.Colombamike wrote:Stupid, no, it's just a "fondamental strategy" => "not put all your eggs in one basket".... (but apparently you can not understand)