Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
PhilippineNavy
Posts: 11
Joined: March 11th, 2013, 11:23 am

Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#1 Post by PhilippineNavy »

Can you draw me an aircraft carrier less than 190 meters armed with 4 Oto Melara 76mm compact guns, Bofors 40mm guns, Stinger or SeaCat missiles???Please! :lol:
Radome
Posts: 1145
Joined: April 15th, 2011, 10:57 pm
Location: Jerusalem, Israel

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#2 Post by Radome »

Why don't you draw it yourself?
- - -> My Worklist! <- - -
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#3 Post by Thiel »

That's a rather tall order don't you think?
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
kerkie
Posts: 128
Joined: May 3rd, 2012, 8:51 am
Location: 221B Bikini Bottom
Contact:

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#4 Post by kerkie »

Wow, really? An aircraft carrier? :shock:
kerkie, (PH)RN, (US)RN, EMT-B

Stercus accidit! :)
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#5 Post by klagldsf »

1. What radome said:
Why don't you draw it yourself?
2. Less than 190 meters? That's smaller than Spain's Principe da Austras (if I'm getting that right, which I know I'm not) which is the smallest carrier constructed since the end of WWII. You're not going to have much of a flight deck if you also have 4 76mm turrets, especially not for a ski-jump.

3. What kind of AU is this anyway? The second-rate military expenditures the Philippines are planning now are highly controversial. We may be broke but they didn't have much money to begin with. People complain about Bush or Obama but the Philippines presidential office has had an "illustrious" history of corruption worse than the Chicago-style. The Thai purchase of a carrier was controversial, and they barely have enough money to barely use it. Without fixed-wing aircraft.
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#6 Post by Blackbuck »

Scratch what I was going to say and +1 with what klagldsf said. Something with such a small footprint just isn't practicable IMO. You have to be well over the 20,000t mark to get anything even worth while studying, let alone building.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
No Gods, Only Monsters
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#7 Post by eswube »

Technically speaking HTMS Chakri Naruebet is about 182m long, with displacement around 12.000 tonnes, but the air group of it (even assuming that Thais had money to operate the second-hand AV-8A's they bought for it) was very small.
User avatar
Rhade
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#8 Post by Rhade »

What about frogs Mistral class ? Not true carrier but similar to Wasp class, that can give us couple of Harriers on board. Poor man carrier in other hand. ;)
Image
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3609
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#9 Post by odysseus1980 »

What about a variant of Guiseppe Garibaldi?It is similar with the Thai aircraft carrier in dimensions and Italians were operated her with helicopters for the first years.They bought Harriers later,about 10 years after the launch of their aircraft carrier.The ship was ordered and built in Italy by Fincantieri and travelled to Phillipines through Suez Canal and Indian Ocean.

But an aircraft carrier demands an armada to protect it,so my opinion is to use it a ASW/ASuW Platform with helicopters only and create several air force bases in your islands.

An idea for the protection of an Arhipelago in a larger water area could be to have 1-2 San Giusto Class Mod or a similar ships with platform and hangar for ASW/ASuW helicopters,anoter 1-2 LPH of similar size for landing missions together with 5-6 modern LSM,3-4 OPVs (The old Hamilton Class is good start),7-8 frigates (MEKO 200 or similar),7-8 corvettes (80-90m long),30-40 missile boats and small hovercrafts for your Marines (look Griffon Hovercrafts 6000+).You can create a ground based Naval Aviation with multirole duties to protect your Arhipelago together with your Air Force,operating helicopteres and aeroplanes.
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Aircraft carrier Design Philippine Navy

#10 Post by Thiel »

You're talking about a navy that has trouble keeping their sole Hamilton at sea here and you want them to operate two ASW carriers and two LPHs?
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Post Reply