Well I like it But thats purely looks-wise (also, hey guys, I'm back)
The aft turret, can it really sit on the hangar like that?
Also, what's the B turret? Is it useful there?
And the fore thruster, the one above the waterline. I think it's pointless...
esp f300
Moderator: Community Manager
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: esp f300
doesn't look half bad! some stufrf doesn't work, but it will float! guess what, seems we reached this guy somewhat after all!
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: esp f300
First welcome back barnest
Second big improvement Alejandro, remember to credit any artists u may or may not have taken from ( this may be all your own work excluding parts). I think you under water hull is kinda shallow compared to the rest of the ship but just may be me.
Second big improvement Alejandro, remember to credit any artists u may or may not have taken from ( this may be all your own work excluding parts). I think you under water hull is kinda shallow compared to the rest of the ship but just may be me.
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Re: esp f300
barnest2 wrote:Well I like it But thats purely looks-wise (also, hey guys, I'm back)
The aft turret, can it really sit on the hangar like that?
Also, what's the B turret? Is it useful there?
And the fore thruster, the one above the waterline. I think it's pointless...
- Short answer, yes. You've gotta work the hangar out around the protruding magazine however which can be done various ways.
- I think it is some sort of medium calibre CIWS like a twin 35 or twin 40 (though to be fair he does have three to four types of CIWS on there)...
- I think that's meant to be a stencil (which he appears to have just straight copy/pasted on there ._. The thruster is also much, much too big to go where it currently is.
@ The design in general - Those lifeboats should really be replaced with modern containerized ones
- I'm pretty sure that OTOMAT cannot be vertical launched nor made to do so
- You've cut off part of the fin on both Harpoons
- Do I see a stern ramp for a dock a la an LHD on there?
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
Re: esp f300
thank you very much
-
- Posts: 272
- Joined: May 12th, 2012, 12:34 am
- Location: Phoenix,Arizona
Re: esp f300
The 2 missiles in the middle have a guidance wing half cut off... Other than that it looks great!
Coming soon....
-Carrier Submarine?
-Missile Interceptor
-Carrier Submarine?
-Missile Interceptor
- bezobrazov
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Re: esp f300
Besides the already mentioned issues, I like to add: Your radar outfit is not consistent, with a British air/surface radar on top of what looks like an Aegis radar tower. Would not happen in real life! Your bridge looks very strange with bridge wings that ends up in the air - nowhere! The angles you've provided, simply doesn't match up with the general layout, and it'd be near-impossible to build it the way you've drawn it. Also, you're showing only one (1) shaft (propeller); I will assume that a ship of this size will need two. Finally, your anchor hawser hole is way, way too much forward and in an impossible position.
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen