Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
Moderator: Community Manager
- Clonecommander6454
- Posts: 760
- Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
Since the Shipbucket's standard have improved so much, and the details missing in the old drawing, I have decided to redraw a newer version of the Kang Ding Class.
Better right? Let's compare it to the old drawing:
Commets are welcome!
New Version below, check it out now!
Better right? Let's compare it to the old drawing:
Commets are welcome!
New Version below, check it out now!
Last edited by Clonecommander6454 on November 8th, 2011, 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
Nice. two small points:
You should reverse the Mk-32 torpedo tubes in the starboard side view and you got the names wrong in the title block. It should read "MConrads & PolluxDeltaSeven & Clonecommander6454"
All in all a fine update.
You should reverse the Mk-32 torpedo tubes in the starboard side view and you got the names wrong in the title block. It should read "MConrads & PolluxDeltaSeven & Clonecommander6454"
All in all a fine update.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐- ๐ป๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐
๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐
-
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
very nice work indeed, but 2 small points:
- the LW-08 radar's foot is a bit lowered into the mast. you cut some important parts of them as well.
-also, those directors look quite bad, I don't know what they are but isn't there an better part around?
- the LW-08 radar's foot is a bit lowered into the mast. you cut some important parts of them as well.
-also, those directors look quite bad, I don't know what they are but isn't there an better part around?
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
Could use more shading.. everything looks to boxy right now.
- - -> My Worklist! <- - -
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: August 5th, 2010, 5:20 pm
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
Very nice improvement! Specially on the radar. Did you draw the radar yourself or is it from a new parts sheet I haven't seen yet?
-
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
don't tell me you have missed the dutch parts sheets for about half an year now :O why do I even do all this work -.-
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
- bezobrazov
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
...and, better looking propellers. Those you have are obsolete ones that really doesn't do the drawing any justice.
My Avatar:ะะตัั ะะปะตะบัะตะตะฒะธั ะะตะทะพะฑัะฐะทะพะฒ (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), ะะธัะต-ะฐะดะผะธัะฐะป , ัะฐััะบะฐั ะะะค ะ ะพััะธะธ(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
And..Take the new SeaHawk too!bezobrazov wrote:...and, better looking propellers. Those you have are obsolete ones that really doesn't do the drawing any justice.
- Clonecommander6454
- Posts: 760
- Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
Updated Version
-Castor-2C
-Jupiter II
-Mk.32 SVTT
-Location of Phalanx
-Exhaust
-Mast
-Hull Stabilizer
-Superstructure details
-Underwater hull shading and Rudder
Looking forward to more comments, propellers will be changed shortly.
-Castor-2C
-Jupiter II
-Mk.32 SVTT
-Location of Phalanx
-Exhaust
-Mast
-Hull Stabilizer
-Superstructure details
-Underwater hull shading and Rudder
Looking forward to more comments, propellers will be changed shortly.
Re: Kang Ding (La Fayette) Class
It is much improved.
Courtesy requires that, if a person wishes to update someone else's drawing, they first get permission from that other person (or at least make an effort to contact them). Did you do so in this case? If not, please do so in the future.
Courtesy requires that, if a person wishes to update someone else's drawing, they first get permission from that other person (or at least make an effort to contact them). Did you do so in this case? If not, please do so in the future.