Page 1 of 2

Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 15th, 2011, 2:28 pm
by Gollevainen
Well nothing fancy this time. I just took the MConrads old Talwar into table, added some shade, removed some lines that didn't exist and repaired the Bridge which was quite wrongly presented. I also replaced the ordanance with the newer variants and added my drawn underwater hull. As the whole class seems to be in intersting reneisance, I also included the Teg class follow on's as well as the Russians very own Admiral Essin class that was just laid down.

Image
Image
Image

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm
by erik_t
I sort of assumed any future use of SA-N-7/12 would be via VLS. The Russians are still building new arm launchers?

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 15th, 2011, 2:47 pm
by Gollevainen
Yea apparently. There have been models of the ship with the VLS, but atleast the arm-launcher is going to be fitted on the repeat-talwars which are nearing completion, and the consensus in russian boards seems to be that arm-launcher would be fitted to the first Russian versions of the ship. Needless to say, the devolpment of the VLS Sthill is propably facing some proplems.

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 15th, 2011, 6:01 pm
by Philbob
that is a intresting propeller design.

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 15th, 2011, 8:20 pm
by klagldsf
A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 16th, 2011, 8:27 am
by rd77
What is that huge missile on the Teg class? Brahmos? Yakhont?

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 16th, 2011, 8:43 am
by Thiel
BrahMos

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 16th, 2011, 2:32 pm
by erik_t
klagldsf wrote:A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section?

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 16th, 2011, 6:27 pm
by Frankiewicz
11356 Model

Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Posted: July 17th, 2011, 6:28 am
by klagldsf
erik_t wrote:
klagldsf wrote:A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section?
What makes you think I implied that? :P