US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Post Reply
Message
Author
MC Spoilt B'stard
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao

US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#1 Post by MC Spoilt B'stard »

After reading about the Saudi Arabian navy's intrest in the Arleigh Burke design for its future Balistic Missile Defence i just tried some thing what i would see as a very nice export version of the Arleigh Burke class flight IIA , recalled it flight IIE, E stands for Export. It is to be believed that they are intrested in 2 to 3 ships.

i'm sure the US will does its best to look for a new allie in the Arab world , after losing Kadafi and other regime's.

Weapons :
- 5 inch (127mm/62) MK45 mod 4
- 32 Cell MK41 VLS for SM-2/VLASROC/ESSM
- 2 Quaduple Harpoon Anti-ship missile's
- 2 MK46 triple torpedo tubes
- 3 20mm Phalanx CIWS
- 16 Cell MK41 VLS for SM-3/Tommahawk

Hangar for 1 NH-90 Helicopter , inside the side door a RHIB is located , can also be used for drone's.

hope its liked,
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#2 Post by Thiel »

Personally, I think they would keep the hulls as similar as possible in order to smooth out production and get the full advantage of the existing production lines. Obviously, some systems would have to be replaced with export variants.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#3 Post by acelanceloet »

they would need to enlarge the hangar though.... which is the major difference between this ship and the standard one, if I am correct ;)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#4 Post by Thiel »

What for? The Saudi's main maritime helicopter is the AS532 Cougar which is slightly smaller than the SeaHawk.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
MC Spoilt B'stard
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#5 Post by MC Spoilt B'stard »

They did order 64 NH-90 helictopers for the naval aviation, dont know what kind of configuration. so thats why i placed a NH-90 on the stern.
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None
polluxdeltaseven
Posts: 29
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 5:20 pm

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#6 Post by polluxdeltaseven »

What for? The Saudi's main maritime helicopter is the AS532 Cougar which is slightly smaller than the SeaHawk.
It's quite the contrary.
The Seahawk is around 15m long, while the Cougar is almost 20m long. Other caracteristics are similars by the way, but in a hangar the Cougar took much more space than a Seahawk or even a NH-90.
But maybe the Saudi version of the Cougar has better folding abilities, I don't know.
Vossiej
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:29 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#7 Post by Vossiej »

The Burke's really need to be redrawn..
“The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person who is doing it.”
Mitchell van Os
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#8 Post by Mitchell van Os »

Vossiej wrote:The Burke's really need to be redrawn..
That will make them even Uglier Vossiej...
Please dont, i am feared of the fact that they will destroy my mirrors and TV screens!
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
Image
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier
MC Spoilt B'stard
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#9 Post by MC Spoilt B'stard »

Yeah Yeah enough chats about the burke drawing , i want comments on my Flight IIE!:D
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None
Vossiej
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:29 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: US Arleigh Burke Class FlightIIE

#10 Post by Vossiej »

Well it looks good, however there are so many burke-deratives on the market right now, the Saudi's could better go for a design like the Korean DDX-III. But otherwise, it looks like a serious phalanx-overkill. I would at least replace the most forward launcher with a RAM, or keep two and upgrade them to SeaRAM. Also, increase hangar capacity to two heli's, there's enough space in there.

But in the end I am against using a 25 year old design for new ships, upgrading an old Burke would be another case..
“The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person who is doing it.”
Post Reply