Page 84 of 90

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: July 26th, 2013, 12:47 am
by emperor_andreas
Love the long bow...great work, Ashley! Will we see the history of the Panzerschiffen on here soon, possibly? :)

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: July 26th, 2013, 1:17 am
by heuhen
The drawing is awesome crazy, but she wold most likely have the problem of rear top end weight... that mean that she will have a bit funky sea-capability, similar to Nelson but more... If you understand me.

But it's interesting.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: July 26th, 2013, 3:09 am
by erik_t
I think that's a dramatic understatement. It seems unlikely to float at all.

It would probably be instructive to mirror the drawing right to left and compare the two side-by-side. Perhaps also bring in a scaled Kirov, as probably the longest-forecastle warship without large heavy turrets forward.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: July 26th, 2013, 8:24 am
by acelanceloet
ah, another set of drawing which defy the rules of physics.
if it floats (it looks very much overweight) it will break in 2 because of the lack of hull depth and the amount of holes in the hull.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: August 2nd, 2013, 5:47 pm
by Dilandu
Hi everyone! Forgive me that I did not show up for a while... A long time actually, hmmm. Besides, i'm back.

And well, what about... for example... the missile-armed "Battle"-class destroyer (oh, jolly old "Brakemine"... ;) ) for the 1946?

Image

And yes, the position of "Squid" is really not so good. Maybe i'll reposition it later.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: August 2nd, 2013, 5:56 pm
by BrentD15
Dilandu wrote:Hi everyone! Forgive me that I did not show up for a while... A long time actually, hmmm. Besides, i'm back.

And well, what about... for example... the missile-armed "Battle"-class destroyer (oh, jolly old "Brakemine"... ;) ) for the 1946?

Image

And yes, the position of "Squid" is really not so good. Maybe i'll reposition it later.
I think the image is broken. :(

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: August 2nd, 2013, 6:02 pm
by Dilandu
Again?! What the f...antastic things happened with this f...amous system?!

Sigh, it need time to correct. Sorry.

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: August 2nd, 2013, 6:09 pm
by Dilandu
WARNING! The "Battle"-class, that served as the basis, were drawn by Portsmouth Bill! I only refitted it.
Sorry, but I work from my phone and simply couldn't place this copyright on the picture itself.
Image

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: August 2nd, 2013, 6:36 pm
by BrentD15
Dilandu wrote:WARNING! The "Battle"-class, that served as the basis, were drawn by Portsmouth Bill! I only refitted it.
Sorry, but I work from my phone and simply couldn't place this copyright on the picture itself.
Image
Much better, and very nice. :)

Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approach

Posted: August 2nd, 2013, 6:38 pm
by Dilandu
Thanks! :)