Page 81 of 123
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 12th, 2013, 2:35 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
That Chinook is too large, for some reason the total length of the aircraft with the blades positioned to extend as far out as possible was used for the length of the fuselage.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 12th, 2013, 9:22 am
by GLACIESFIRE
I took the CH-47 from the Planebucket, but it seems to be in the right scale...
Put it next to an NH-90 and you will see that is in the right scale...
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 12th, 2013, 9:31 am
by Little Bird
This is my Chinook:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 20th, 2013, 12:36 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
Ok, I went back into my notes from when I discovered the miscalling. I've put together a Mike-ish image from all the images I'd drawn revolving around this issue.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 20th, 2013, 1:43 am
by klagldsf
>Global Security
>Accurate
>Reliable
>mfw
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 20th, 2013, 2:07 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
Hey, best I could find for the fuselage length. :/ If you have better sources, please share them.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 20th, 2013, 2:16 am
by TimothyC
US Army Training manuals give a fuselage length of 52 feet 1 inch.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 20th, 2013, 3:19 pm
by KIKE92
Do we have the North American T-28 Trojan in planebucket?
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 20th, 2013, 6:43 pm
by Little Bird
Ok, i will work on a new Chinook.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Posted: December 20th, 2013, 9:17 pm
by shippy2013
I don't know if its help or hinderance but when I was working on a carrier for myself I attempted to kitbash Little Birds Chinnok and Timothy C's Chinook he pm'd me to try to get a better more accurate chinnok.
migvht be complete tosh for all I know.