Page 76 of 123

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 12th, 2013, 2:33 pm
by Rhade
Maybe add some shadows under wings and engine ?

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 23rd, 2013, 2:24 pm
by acelanceloet
if I recall correctly, we already have an fokker DVII.......

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 23rd, 2013, 2:39 pm
by DG_Alpha
We do. I got the base for this one from a sheet somewhere in my collection. What I did was adding a few details and added the 'landed' version.

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 23rd, 2013, 2:43 pm
by acelanceloet
then I have said nothing :P that said, I urge you to look up my dutch parts sheet and update those details there too :P

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 26th, 2013, 12:08 pm
by Rhade
Zeros on IJA-IJN Plane sheet are highly outdated.

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 26th, 2013, 6:10 pm
by Raxar
Rhade wrote:Zeros on IJA-IJN Plane sheet are highly outdated.
As are Vals and Kates.

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 26th, 2013, 6:14 pm
by klagldsf
Plus I didn't draw any of the planes on that sheet. I don't know why you even think that.

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: February 27th, 2013, 10:20 am
by Rhade
Raxar wrote:As are Vals and Kates.
Aye, but Zeros has been updated pretty long time ago. ;)

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: March 4th, 2013, 5:04 pm
by Shipright
Out of curiosity does anyone know where I can find a bow on drawing of any SH-60 helo variant? I can find every aspect except the bow.

Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread

Posted: March 6th, 2013, 5:35 am
by klagldsf
I don't know why they think it would be a good idea to make an Avanti UAV. Surveillance UAVs owe quite a bit of their success to being relatively quiet - which is what the Avanti is the exact opposite of (I've been around enough of them to know).