Grays Harbor Designs
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
What I believe may be the finalized design.
Thanks to everybody for your ideas and suggestions.
Thanks to everybody for your ideas and suggestions.
Last edited by Zephyr on May 13th, 2012, 9:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
Please toss the 20mm gun and its sponsoon. You've already got full coverage from your CIWS, and if that's not enough for you there's a pair of perfectly usable bridge wings just above. Your current setup is going to act like a giant radar reflector which kinda defeats the purpose of the proto-stealth features.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
To go along with the Kastens, I also have a Group 2 (Port Lucie Class) and Group 3 (Olympia Class). On these the aft turret was replaced with a 48-cell VLS. A deckhouse was added aft of the helipad to permit sufficient space for the magazine. The Kastens were built from 1991-94, 16 boats.
Port Lucie Class (Built 1995-97, 13 boats)
Olympia Class (Built 1997-2001, 19 boats)
Port Lucie Class (Built 1995-97, 13 boats)
Olympia Class (Built 1997-2001, 19 boats)
Last edited by Zephyr on May 13th, 2012, 9:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
Thiel wrote:Please toss the 20mm gun and its sponsoon. You've already got full coverage from your CIWS, and if that's not enough for you there's a pair of perfectly usable bridge wings just above. Your current setup is going to act like a giant radar reflector which kinda defeats the purpose of the proto-stealth features.
umm ... hadn't thought of that.
EDIT: OK, fixed.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
I've revisited my Mars, St Edwards, Kasten, Port Lucie and Olympia Classes; made a few tweaks, hopefully improved them some.
Comments as to whether I was succeded or not are, of course, welcomed.
Comments as to whether I was succeded or not are, of course, welcomed.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
There is something missing (design wise), but I'm having a hard time putting my finger on it (probably because I'm studding for exams). I think it might be the aft SPY-1 faces - I'd think about raising them up even half a deck (like they are on the Flight IIA Burkeswarm).
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
Raise them a bit? Hmm. I'll play with that some and see what happens.
"Burkeswarm" I like that.
"Burkeswarm" I like that.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
I'd change the St. Edwards class to have angular funnels rather than the round ones ist has now, get rid of the sponsoon with the 20mm gun and find space for ASW torpedo tubes.
Oh and either replace the Mk. 29 launcher with a dedicated VLS or leave out ESSM altogether.
Oh and either replace the Mk. 29 launcher with a dedicated VLS or leave out ESSM altogether.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
Re: Grays Harbor Designs
I'm not a big fan of angular funnels. I really prefer gently rounded ends. It just looks better to me. Is there a reason to go angular instead of rounded besides aesthetics?Thiel wrote:I'd change the St. Edwards class to have angular funnels rather than the round ones ist has now, get rid of the sponsoon with the 20mm gun and find space for ASW torpedo tubes.
Oh and either replace the Mk. 29 launcher with a dedicated VLS or leave out ESSM altogether.
Why no sponson? Just curious.
ASW tubes. I kinda forgot those. made room midships for a pair of triple tubes.
I don't really see the problem with having a Mk.29 on there. This ship, after all, was designed with a single purpose, to be a surface strike ship. AA is purely point defense. The ship as designed was literally built around the Viper NSM, to be nothing more than an efficient delivery system for SSM's. I chose the Mk.29 because it has a relatively small footprint, no deck penetration and an effective missile in the SeaSpike Mk IV (RIM-162 ESSM). Putting the ESSM in the regular VLS tubes would take space away from packing in more Vipers. Being quadpacked, admitedly not much, but some nonetheless. I also couldn't find a reasonable slot for a Mk.48 VLS except maybe the small Mod 0 or Mod 1. As it stands though, I remembered I also use the SeaDagger (RIM-116 RAM) so I replaced the Mk.29 with a Mk.49 with the bonus I guess you could say of having 21 missiles instead of only 8.
If any of that makes sense ...
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor