Page 7 of 51
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 19th, 2011, 1:04 pm
by KimWerner
Yes this light carrier was speciel in many ways, but it's a marvellous drawing Bombhead had done
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 19th, 2011, 8:15 pm
by Hood
I'll check Friedman's British Carriers book, I'm sure it has some underwater details on Unicorn.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 19th, 2011, 8:18 pm
by Bombhead
Thanks mate that would be great
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 22nd, 2011, 8:49 pm
by Bombhead
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 22nd, 2011, 10:21 pm
by Novice
Excellent work Bombhead. BTW IIRC the "K" was for HMAS Sydney during the Korean war.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 23rd, 2011, 11:58 pm
by Bombhead
Thanks Novice. I think Triumph was deck letter P.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 24th, 2011, 11:08 am
by Hood
Yes the rudder should be bigger on Unicorn, by my estimations from the plan in Friedman about 10 pixels longer and about 2-3 pixels lower. The plan shows a sharper line from the keel up to the propellers but it has no propeller details at all.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 24th, 2011, 11:15 am
by Bombhead
Thanks Hood that will give me more to work on.
Heres an update with the port side of Triumph.Does anyone know where I can find a Supermarine Sea Otter ?
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 24th, 2011, 4:04 pm
by Hood
This might help, the Sea Otter is at the far right but you might need to improve a tweak it a bit.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: September 24th, 2011, 8:57 pm
by Philbob
would you mind doing one of the Colossus class that was built as a maintaince ship?