Shipbucket

beautiful Dove's will their be any more like Royal Navy ones or civilian ones ? and will you be doing the Heron to?

Outstanding set of choppers and aircraft, Kilomuse!

Nice work Kilomuse

EXCELLENT work Kilomuse

Jolly well done old chap

Wow! Awesome work Kilomuse!

Thanks guys! Do you guys like this format with all the operators on a single sheet? I'm working on a few more urrently - the Pilatus PC-6, Max Holste Broussard, North American Sabreliner, and Hawker-Siddeley HS.125.

Excellent additions Kilomouse, loving the Doves and your work list has some good types on it too.

Kilomuse wrote:Thanks guys! Do you guys like this format with all the operators on a single sheet?

Yes and no. On the one hand, when there are a lot of operators, for me a single sheet for all of them is a proper way to show them, like Darth Panda has done with the F-86, instead of posting twenty or thirty different sheets.
On the other hand, I personally think the major operator (large number of airframes or variants used) deserves his own sheet with the minor operators (only a small number of airframes used) put on a single sheet. But that's only how I would do it. In the end it's up to you what suits you best.

Kilomuse wrote:I'm working on a few more urrently - the Pilatus PC-6, Max Holste Broussard, North American Sabreliner, and Hawker-Siddeley HS.125.

Can't wait for the Sabreliner. The Us had quite a number of different liveries for them.


And last but not least: Will your HS.125 include the 800s military variants or only the early T.1 and CC.1?

Cascadia wrote:In the end it's up to you what suits you best.

And last but not least: Will your HS.125 include the 800s military variants or only the early T.1 and CC.1?

I agree with your idea of splitting up the major users and grouping together the smaller operators. My goal is to represent the types, but also avoid cluttering up the forum and making the FD archivists' lives more difficult

As for the HS.125, yes I would like to do the military variants as well. I'm looking for reference pics for those.

To me (being the one who's practically behind the "archivist" account) it would suffice if the drawings were sorted on "by user" manner (instead of "by version" manner, like it happend, for example with Spitfire or P-51), with those users that are represented with just 1 paint scheme being grouped together (like, for example, could be seen in my R-5 drawings few pages ago - Soviet planes were posted on 2 sheets - because there were many of them, Spanish on 1, and the rest on another one).