Nihon Kaigun 1946
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Hi Emperor_Andreas,
The ship looks nice, but Constitution? I thought that there was already a Constitution in active service at that point (and to this day) - the 1790s frigate, in much the same fashion as the British Victory...
Regards,
Adam
The ship looks nice, but Constitution? I thought that there was already a Constitution in active service at that point (and to this day) - the 1790s frigate, in much the same fashion as the British Victory...
Regards,
Adam
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Technically speaking Constitution was the name of one of the planned Lexington class Battlecruisers too..apdsmith wrote:The ship looks nice, but Constitution? I thought that there was already a Constitution in active service at that point (and to this day) - the 1790s frigate, in much the same fashion as the British Victory...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Consti ... 5%29#Ships
Any omonimy with the old ship was avoided by renaming Old Ironsides into "Old Constitution" on December 1917. Obviously, when the Battlecruiser was canceled under the Washington Naval Treaty terms Old Ironsides effectively returned to her original name, officaly on 24 July 1925.
I suppose we might assume that the same escamotage was used in Emperor's AU too.
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Great minds think alike, my friend...I was just writing a post saying that very thing!
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Nice concept ship, but the use of the name Antietam was already use by an Essex class carrier CV-36
Thank you Kim for the crest
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
That's right, and with the war being extended to late '46, she would have seen action along with Boxer, Kearsarge, Tarawa, Phillipine Sea and Princeton... something to think about, anyways...Novice wrote:Nice concept ship, but the use of the name Antietam was already use by an Essex class carrier CV-36
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
USN carriers are named differently in this AU; the Essex-class is known as the Bunker Hill-class. CV-36 is named Lake Champlain. Here's a full list of USN CVs for this AU up to CV-58 (not including CVEs):
Langley-class
Langley (CV-1)
Lexington-class
Lexington (CV-2)
Saratoga (CV-3)
Bennington-class
Bennington (CV-4)
Yorktown-class
Yorktown (CV-5)
Enterprise (CV-6)
Wasp (CV-7)
Hornet (CV-8)
Bunker Hill-class (Short Hull Batch 1)
Bunker Hill (CV-9)
Ticonderoga (CV-10)
Lexington (CV-11)
White Plains (CV-12)
Essex (CV-13)
Bon Homme Richard (CV-14)
Intrepid (CV-15)
Yorktown (CV-16)
Franklin (CV-17)
Kitty Hawk (CV-18)
Wasp (CV-19)
Oriskany (CV-20)
Hancock (CV-21)
Independence-class
Independence (CVL-22)
Princeton (CVL-23)
Belleau Wood (CVL-24)
Cowpens (CVL-25)
Monterey (CVL-26)
Cabot (CVL-27)
Bataan (CVL-28)
San Jacinto (CVL-29)
Kernstown (CVL-30)
Bunker Hill-class (Long Hull Batch 1)
Hornet (CV-31)
Crown Point (CV-32)
Reprisal (CV-33)
Redemption (CV-34)
Shangri-La (CV-35)
Lake Champlain (CV-36)
Tarawa (CV-37)
Valley Forge (CV-38)
Iwo Jima (CV-39)
Philippine Sea (CV-40)
Midway-class (Batch 1)
Midway (CVB-41)
Franklin D. Roosevelt (CVB-42)
Coral Sea (CVB-43)
Pearl Harbor (CVB-44)
Bunker Hill-class (Short Hull Batch 2)
Fort Sumter (CV-45)
Bull Run (CV-46)
Kearsarge (CV-47)
Saipan-class
Saipan (CVL-48)
Wright (CVL-49)
Bunker Hill-class (Long Hull Batch 2)
Fort Donelson (CV-50)
Malvern Hill (CV-51)
Perryville (CV-52)
Fredericksburg (CV-53)
Chancellorsville (CV-54)
Chickamauga (CV-55)
Midway-class (Batch 2)
Guadalcanal (CVB-56)
Leyte Gulf (CVB-57)
Langley-class
Langley (CV-1)
Lexington-class
Lexington (CV-2)
Saratoga (CV-3)
Bennington-class
Bennington (CV-4)
Yorktown-class
Yorktown (CV-5)
Enterprise (CV-6)
Wasp (CV-7)
Hornet (CV-8)
Bunker Hill-class (Short Hull Batch 1)
Bunker Hill (CV-9)
Ticonderoga (CV-10)
Lexington (CV-11)
White Plains (CV-12)
Essex (CV-13)
Bon Homme Richard (CV-14)
Intrepid (CV-15)
Yorktown (CV-16)
Franklin (CV-17)
Kitty Hawk (CV-18)
Wasp (CV-19)
Oriskany (CV-20)
Hancock (CV-21)
Independence-class
Independence (CVL-22)
Princeton (CVL-23)
Belleau Wood (CVL-24)
Cowpens (CVL-25)
Monterey (CVL-26)
Cabot (CVL-27)
Bataan (CVL-28)
San Jacinto (CVL-29)
Kernstown (CVL-30)
Bunker Hill-class (Long Hull Batch 1)
Hornet (CV-31)
Crown Point (CV-32)
Reprisal (CV-33)
Redemption (CV-34)
Shangri-La (CV-35)
Lake Champlain (CV-36)
Tarawa (CV-37)
Valley Forge (CV-38)
Iwo Jima (CV-39)
Philippine Sea (CV-40)
Midway-class (Batch 1)
Midway (CVB-41)
Franklin D. Roosevelt (CVB-42)
Coral Sea (CVB-43)
Pearl Harbor (CVB-44)
Bunker Hill-class (Short Hull Batch 2)
Fort Sumter (CV-45)
Bull Run (CV-46)
Kearsarge (CV-47)
Saipan-class
Saipan (CVL-48)
Wright (CVL-49)
Bunker Hill-class (Long Hull Batch 2)
Fort Donelson (CV-50)
Malvern Hill (CV-51)
Perryville (CV-52)
Fredericksburg (CV-53)
Chancellorsville (CV-54)
Chickamauga (CV-55)
Midway-class (Batch 2)
Guadalcanal (CVB-56)
Leyte Gulf (CVB-57)
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
may I ask, on the Constitution class, what did you sacrifice for the heavier arnament on the same hull? you have heavier main guns, more secondaries ....
I also cannot really see why you moved the funnel, floatplane there or not, I think it is now in a worse position then originally for smoke interference.
I also cannot really see why you moved the funnel, floatplane there or not, I think it is now in a worse position then originally for smoke interference.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Hi Ace,
I'd figured that the main guns were now twins instead of triples, wouldn't that (roughly) come out the same weight?
Regards,
Adam
I'd figured that the main guns were now twins instead of triples, wouldn't that (roughly) come out the same weight?
Regards,
Adam