Shipbucket

Very impressive, my dark lord.
So where put I my imperial blaster?

Cascadia wrote:Very impressive, my dark lord.
So where put I my imperial blaster?

you have my permission my young apprentice.....

Darthpanda... I hate to write this, but... length of Sterling SMG is 481mm with folded stock and 686mm with stock extended - in feet that's roughly 1 1/2 feet and 2 1/4 feet respectively.
Otherwise both drawings are simply awesome!

Yeah, was going to comment on how those Sterlings look more like howitzers than small arms.

eswube wrote:Darthpanda... I hate to write this, but... length of Sterling SMG is 481mm with folded stock and 686mm with stock extended - in feet that's roughly 1 1/2 feet and 2 1/4 feet respectively.
Otherwise both drawings are simply awesome!

The nice thing about that scale is that it reveals a lot of technical detail and I think emphasizes the simplicity of the weapons, so I'd be willing to let it slide or rather accommodate it in some fashion.

klagldsf wrote:

eswube wrote:Darthpanda... I hate to write this, but... length of Sterling SMG is 481mm with folded stock and 686mm with stock extended - in feet that's roughly 1 1/2 feet and 2 1/4 feet respectively.
Otherwise both drawings are simply awesome!

The nice thing about that scale is that it reveals a lot of technical detail and I think emphasizes the simplicity of the weapons, so I'd be willing to let it slide or rather accommodate it in some fashion.

...

It's not in scale. Therefore it has no place in this thread. It needs to be correctly redrawn.

It's almost twice the size of what it should be. If you want to start a new gun scale, start a new thread.

If you want to start a new gun scale, start a new thread.

Just noting, sheesh. And you call me angry.

Generally your posts can be interpreted as such, yes.

I'm just policing a thread to make sure the scale and style is adhered to.