Submarines

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
WWII44
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm

Re: Submarines

#381 Post by WWII44 »

You should do the Type U-19 u-boat some time

Image
User avatar
KimWerner
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Submarines

#382 Post by KimWerner »

DP, I just love your subs :D
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: Submarines

#383 Post by Wolfman »

What's next, Darth Panda?
User avatar
darthpanda
Posts: 3449
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
Contact:

Re: Submarines

#384 Post by darthpanda »

WWII44 wrote:You should do the Type U-19 u-boat some time

Image
I want it too, but I don't have a good reverance materials.
Wolfman wrote:What's next, Darth Panda?
Not sure yet, I'm busy with a comic drawing of a medieval farm girl.
Worklist:
- Victorian Navy - LINK
- ROC/Taiwan - 中華民國空軍 / 陸軍航特部 / 海軍航空兵 - LINK
- RHKAAF / HKGFS - 皇家香港輔助空軍 / 政府飛行服務隊
- Gunbucket - LINK

天滅中共全黨死清光!
WWII44
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm

Re: Submarines

#385 Post by WWII44 »

Simon Lake's Protector would be a nice adition to the Shipbucket collection Image
User avatar
Raxar
Posts: 1407
Joined: August 31st, 2011, 4:49 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Submarines

#386 Post by Raxar »

Why don't you draw it WWII44? A quick google search found multiple line drawings and photos, and a ship like this shouldn't be too difficult.
Worklist

"If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done." ~Ludwig Wittgenstein
WWII44
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm

Re: Submarines

#387 Post by WWII44 »

My feeble attempt at drawing the Simon Lakes Protector, note I had to some guess work as there is no documentation on the sub other than drawings(most of them cut aways). I also used Russia as the country name as that's who Lake sold her to.

Image
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Submarines

#388 Post by eswube »

I think You could add bit shading on tower and other rounded elements (to show they are rounded), but otherwise it looks nice. :)

EDIT: After reading comments below and looking more closely, I have to agree that it indeed looks oversized, which means, of course, that it has to be fixed ASAP, or it wouldn' "look nice" any longer. :/
Last edited by eswube on July 14th, 2013, 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
waritem
Posts: 354
Joined: August 4th, 2011, 6:37 am
Location: France

Re: Submarines

#389 Post by waritem »

Ain't there's a problem of scale?
The ship seems far smaller on the photo.........................
"You can rape history, if you give her a child"
Alexandre Dumas

JE SUIS CHARLIE
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Submarines

#390 Post by acelanceloet »

yep, she is oversized, the size I found was 92 feet = 28 and a bit meters. the drawing is over 40......
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Post Reply