The Socialist Republic of Sieran

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#371 Post by denodon »

That's a good idea yeah, when I do actually draw the carrier I'll probably look into including some. Still not decided whether I want just a steel deck or steel with planking on top. The wood would give better grip for the poor guys that have to work on deck during the poorer weather. Might complicate de icing however.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
Rodondo
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#372 Post by Rodondo »

Steel and Wood both have their pros and cons

Added Wood Pro's:

*Better insulator, especially across a big surface
*Low temperatures doesn't greatly affect strength
*Cheap


Just Steel Pro's
*Less weight (75t-200t worth)
*Not a fire hazard
*Needs to be replaced as a whole, a lot less
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#373 Post by denodon »

Hmm, in that case I may go with wood simply because of the benefits it has.

Also nobody got feedback on the bomber concept? I'm still not entirely sure about it for some reason.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
User avatar
Rowdy36
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#374 Post by Rowdy36 »

I think the TSB looks pretty good, the design seems to suite the era well and it looks like it has come from the pedigree of the TB-31. My only thoughts were if there was enough space in the present configuration for internal torpedo carriage?
Image
User avatar
Kilomuse
Posts: 487
Joined: August 6th, 2010, 4:07 am
Location: California

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#375 Post by Kilomuse »

The torpedo bomber looks good. If the main gear eats up internal space for a torpedo, you could carry the torpedo semi-recessed, maybe by removing the bomb bay doors.
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#376 Post by eswube »

Sorry for not commenting the bomber earlier. Like Rowdy36 and Kilomuse, I like it general looks and I too have some doubts about the main gear reducing space for bomb bay.
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#377 Post by denodon »

I wasn't sure what kind of gear I could really use for the aircraft, though I agree it would use a decent amount of space with that Grumman style arrangement it has currently.
Any ideas where else I could move it? I looked at the Avengers gear as that plane is roughly the same time period and overall design similarity to the TSB but I have no idea how their gear works.

Also is it feasible to fit a bomb crutch in the bomb bay to allow for dive bombing using the internal bay or is it easier to just use the hardpoints under each wing instead?
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#378 Post by eswube »

Avenger had the landing gear retracted to the wings, towards their tips (in principle like Spitfire or Bf-109).
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ger_23.JPG
I suppose that it would be possible to install a crutch in the bay, but hardpoints would be simpler and probably much more practical.
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#379 Post by denodon »

The Avengers gear arrangement might work best then, free up space in the fuselage for the longer bomb bay needed to lift a torpedo. Probably a bit lighter too. I'm guessing the engine would have to be in the 1400hp range for this aircraft, a vast improvement on the TBs 800hp engine.
I'll probably stick with the hardpoints then, they're certainly much more simple and allow for the carriage of other weapons outside of the bomb bay.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: The Socialist Republic of Sieran

#380 Post by eswube »

You could also try the gear arrangement similar to the one on F6F Hellcat and P-36/P-40 - wheel rotating 90deg. and retracting backwards.
http://chivethebrigade.files.wordpress. ... 920-31.jpg
Post Reply