FD Aircraft 19

Post all FD scale drawings here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#351 Post by eswube »

Great work from everyone.
Torpid_Hunter
Posts: 96
Joined: July 8th, 2021, 12:12 am
Location: Ontario
Contact:

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#352 Post by Torpid_Hunter »

Image
German Me-262! :)
raafif
Posts: 102
Joined: June 27th, 2012, 9:55 am

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#353 Post by raafif »

Image
Last edited by raafif on December 11th, 2022, 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hood
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#354 Post by Hood »

Nice additions from everyone.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
User avatar
MattewEx
Posts: 149
Joined: November 6th, 2017, 7:13 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#355 Post by MattewEx »

Bell Subaru UH-2

Image
Image
rbz88
Posts: 71
Joined: June 27th, 2022, 11:44 pm

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#356 Post by rbz88 »

Try to give the plane that I think to be impressive yesterday
Image
  • Wherever our Party and our army went, the people welcomed us with open arms, and we were able to take advantage of the time of the day, and we can still see the vibrant life and development of all things in front of our eyes. Twenty years later, has this place become our burial place?
    In any case, the strength of the battle was 800,000 to 600,000, and the advantage is mine!
Image
rbz88
Posts: 71
Joined: June 27th, 2022, 11:44 pm

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#357 Post by rbz88 »

And the J-20 draw before which the original url link is broken
Image
  • Wherever our Party and our army went, the people welcomed us with open arms, and we were able to take advantage of the time of the day, and we can still see the vibrant life and development of all things in front of our eyes. Twenty years later, has this place become our burial place?
    In any case, the strength of the battle was 800,000 to 600,000, and the advantage is mine!
Image
rbz88
Posts: 71
Joined: June 27th, 2022, 11:44 pm

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#358 Post by rbz88 »

PLAAF J-16D
Image
  • Wherever our Party and our army went, the people welcomed us with open arms, and we were able to take advantage of the time of the day, and we can still see the vibrant life and development of all things in front of our eyes. Twenty years later, has this place become our burial place?
    In any case, the strength of the battle was 800,000 to 600,000, and the advantage is mine!
Image
User avatar
DeadRight
Posts: 94
Joined: October 11th, 2015, 3:23 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#359 Post by DeadRight »

Ilyushin IL-76.

Image
Image
Rail Air Ships Transportation
Sheepster
Posts: 733
Joined: December 23rd, 2016, 12:28 pm
Location: Darwin, Australia

Re: FD Aircraft 19

#360 Post by Sheepster »

Fiat CR.42 DB

Still the fastest biplane aircraft ever built.

Image

The Fiat CR.42 first flew in 1939 with a Fiat A.74 R.C.38 radial engine, and was one of the very last combat biplanes built. With good performance and excellent maneuverability, the CR.42 was the pinacle of biplane fighter design, but the greater speed potential of monoplane fighters had moved to overcome the maneuverability advantage inherent in biplanes. In an attempt to overcome the speed factor the Italian Air Ministry requested Fiat to examine re-engining the CR.42 with the upcoming Alfa Romeo R.A.1000 R.C.41 engine, the licence built DB 601.
As the engine was still in development, a DB 601A was sourced from Germany, and the CR.42 rebuilt arount the new inline engine.
Construction was rapid and the aircraft first flew in March 1941. Although heavier and longer than the standard model, the performance of the new CR.42 DB was impressive; being 90 kph faster and with impressive climb rates and maximum altitudes. An order was placed for 150 aircraft, but due to unavailability of engines - due to slow production and pre-allocation to the Re,2001 and MC.202 - none was ever built and the sole CR.42 DB became a historical sidenote.
Post Reply