SUSA

Post any drawings that are not one of the official Shipbucket formats here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: SUSA

#31 Post by eswube »

Nice work.
Skyder2598
Posts: 516
Joined: April 29th, 2015, 7:57 pm
Location: Germany

Re: SUSA

#32 Post by Skyder2598 »

Nice work sebu :-)
best regards
Martin

~~Normerr~~FD stuff~~
sebu
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am

Re: SUSA

#33 Post by sebu »

Thanks Fellows.
An update for SUSA. Moon mission supposed to be ~ 60t/120m3. I assume, it needs 3-4 launches to certain (...don't know...) orbit to able to reach the Moon.

Image
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: SUSA

#34 Post by eswube »

Looks very nice, as usual. :)
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: SUSA

#35 Post by erik_t »

The downside I see for your notional lunar mission is that the docking ports on the descent pods are going to be stressed pretty badly during your insertion burns. This is one downside of lifting bodies: it's hard to come up with a linear stack that makes much sense.
sebu
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am

Re: SUSA

#36 Post by sebu »

Thanks chaps.
erik_t wrote:The downside I see for your notional lunar mission is that the docking ports on the descent pods are going to be stressed pretty badly during your insertion burns. This is one downside of lifting bodies: it's hard to come up with a linear stack that makes much sense.
I agree, that may be a problem. Perhaps that's why I haven't seen any of this kind of concepts yet :)
I was thinking if a bounded/integrated "shelter" for landers would divide the stress :?:
Image
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: SUSA

#37 Post by erik_t »

That's not a bad idea. That component could launch long-and-skinny, turn 90deg for mating with the overall spacecraft, and then you're in good shape. I would probably draw the "shelters" as open space-frame trusses, but I like the concept a lot more now.

I think you need a big angry engine bell for your insertion engine, though!
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: SUSA

#38 Post by heuhen »

interesting.
erik_t wrote:I would probably draw the "shelters" as open space-frame trusses
Space isn't my speciality. But what with a Frame with inside a airtight canvas (lightweight and all that), and you can work on the lander inside a airtight environment... if an emergency service is needed.
sebu
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am

Re: SUSA

#39 Post by sebu »

Thanks for comments, lads.

I think I'll have to retain in "long-and-skinny" form in able to have as light landers as possible. Those are supposed to refuel in the Moon surface; either from cargo landers or/and with ice founded...
Not really sure what heuhen meant, but here is a rough section sketch of the vessel.
Image
Btw. "Angrier" engine bells added to original drawing.
Last edited by sebu on July 26th, 2016, 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: SUSA

#40 Post by heuhen »

sebu wrote:Thanks for comments, lads.

I think I'll have to retain in "long-and-skinny" form in able to have as light landers as possible. Those are supposed to refuel in the Moon surface; either from cargo landers or/and with ice founded...
Not really sure what heuhen meant, but here is a rough section sketch of the vessel.
Image

I was thinking something along these one (lightweight, somewhat easy to transport):

(Inflateable station structure)
Image
Image
Image
Image

The lander would have to be transported from the surface (earth), on a separate transport system anyway, before getting connected to the "space-ship" itself up in space. If not the lander is transported in a sort of container, that is just adde on the spaceship.
Post Reply