Improved Type 22 + 23 Frigates

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Rowdy36
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#31 Post by Rowdy36 »

Having just checked it myself there is no way that the drawings are related in any way, other than the fact that they are both Type 23's or variants of Type 23's.

I love the work you've done on these Blackbuck, any more on the way?
Image
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#32 Post by acelanceloet »

also, note that all parts shown here but the propeller were also on miho's drawing. if blackbuck must credit anyone over this, it should be miho, and then bezo should credit miho as well. it is as simple of that, so I think case closed (if it wasn't already before)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#33 Post by Blackbuck »

Christ, I wish I'd never have started these things.
eswube wrote:Interesting concept. And of course great drawing.
Trojan wrote:Fantastic drawing as always.
Cheers for the kind words!
Colosseum wrote:
bezobrazov wrote:Well, whatever, ace. I don't believe it, but I don't give a farthing about it anymore. So be it then.
You should pull both drawings into Paint and compare if you think they are the same. If there's a legitimate reason for concern we can address it then.
Easy enough if people are that concerned
RP1 wrote:Not sure if serious?

You know the radar and RESM are on the parts sheet, right?

RP1
Honestly, I'm not sure either :roll:
Rowdy36 wrote:Having just checked it myself there is no way that the drawings are related in any way, other than the fact that they are both Type 23's or variants of Type 23's.

I love the work you've done on these Blackbuck, any more on the way?
Possibly. Depending on what I can think of, there should be a couple of AU ones to come too.
acelanceloet wrote:also, note that all parts shown here but the propeller were also on miho's drawing. if blackbuck must credit anyone over this, it should be miho, and then bezo should credit miho as well. it is as simple of that, so I think case closed (if it wasn't already before)
^ This.

ETA: If you're so worked up about it here are my WIP sheets for the damned thing. I'm sure given the chance somebody will have the audacity to say I stole the WIPs too... :roll:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/942 ... 23/T23.PNG
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/942 ... 23_WIP.PNG
Last edited by Blackbuck on July 8th, 2014, 7:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#34 Post by heuhen »

Excellent work.


rest of you, at least some of you. Cry me a river, cry baby!!
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Revised Off-Spins (New England Navy)

#35 Post by Blackbuck »

Updates to a previous theme...

A trio of offshoots from the original path. No US systems (that I know of) on there once again.

Image
Image
Image

Firstly
Local area defence AA boats equipped with Aster 15 and MICA-VL (soon to be supplanted by Sea Ceptor, freeing up space for a better Aster load)

Secondly
General-purpose and ASW boats equipped with a towed array and 127mm for NGFS. These feature a proper full width hangar for two Lynx or a single Merlin. The enlarged hangar block and enclosed quarter deck in theory allow for a greater amount of surge accommodation for raiding parties / security forces

Thirdly
A "minimum LCS" based in part off of the remarks of RP1 earlier in the thread. Similar to the GP vessels but with the capability of operating unmanned assets (in this case UAV and USVs) Seastreak replaces the Millennium for nothing more than cool factor really, that and in theory it can be used in the SSM role to support Spike-NLOS on small skiffs and the like.

Footnote
When they finally get Sea Ceptor they'll sport a datalink antenna at either end roughly where the original directors on a T23 would be. More possibly to come on these as the AU evolves...

~Mark.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#36 Post by Blackbuck »

I woke up pondering how a more heavily LO considered Super Duke would possibly look and ended up with the following... Namely a halfway house between the Type 23 and Type 26.

Image

~Regards, Mark.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
User avatar
shippy2013
Posts: 658
Joined: March 26th, 2013, 7:44 pm
Location: Nottingham. United Kingdom

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#37 Post by shippy2013 »

I like. I like a lot..........
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#38 Post by eswube »

Very interesting! Great work!
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#39 Post by Blackbuck »

Thanks for the kind words gents.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: (Notional) Super Type 23

#40 Post by odysseus1980 »

Very good work with Type23, that frigate really worth the money cost.

A variant with Sea Wolf/ Sea Eagle for RN AU perhaps?
Post Reply