Project DX

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Project DX

#31 Post by eswube »

Very interesting. Keep it up.
Hood
Posts: 7237
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Project DX

#32 Post by Hood »

Nice additions and interesting work based on textual sources. Not pretty ships but certainly interesting.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Project DX

#33 Post by acelanceloet »

as I finally finished these but got stuck on the designs directly before them, I throw the chronological order overboard for the moment.
the ship this entire project is about!
Image
Image
other ships/dates are coming soon, as is the background story, but I did not want to keep this from you all after staying silence for literally monts in this thread.

feel free too shoot holes in the drawing, as I want it to be as good as it can be.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Project DX

#34 Post by erik_t »

They look very nice! However, I think this drawing may be a good opportunity to decide if we're really, really, actually happy with the current SPS-40 and (....?) SPS-58 drawings.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Project DX

#35 Post by acelanceloet »

if there are references for the SPS-40, I will gladly take it on. the scale is correct though with the reference drawing from US destroyers, as is the shape, so for me it was acceptable......

SPS-58? that one is not on the spruance, is it?
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Project DX

#36 Post by erik_t »

Whatever the smaller air search set is aft. I don't think that's TAS Mk 23, not in 1975.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Project DX

#37 Post by acelanceloet »

erik_t wrote:Whatever the smaller air search set is aft. I don't think that's TAS Mk 23, not in 1975.
it is..... but it should not be there. fixed as we speak.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Hood
Posts: 7237
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Project DX

#38 Post by Hood »

Well I'm no USN expert, but I like what I see. Great job, nice to see this ticking along in whatever you order you wish.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Project DX

#39 Post by acelanceloet »

updated and added some of the actual spruance class (real and never build both) into the first post. most of the pre-VLS variations are now drawn. (apart from kidd, that is) if you spot any errors, please notify me ;)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Project DX

#40 Post by Thiel »

One thing I just noticed, on the August 1966 concept you've got a BPDMS director, but no missile or launcher.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Post Reply