Japan - Never built IJN ships.

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
BB1987
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#31 Post by BB1987 »

Another round, The 1930 Fujimoto designs:

This warship was designed by Captain Fujimoto to replace the Fuso class Battleship, and like the one designed by Hiraga (planned to replace the Kongo class) plans to build her where canceld with the ratification of the london naval treaty in 1931.

The first design called for a treaty battleship armed with nine 16.1-inch (409mm) guns in three triple turrets, secondaries where composed by twelve 6-inch (152mm) guns in six twin turrets, unusally fitted outside the armour belt and (at least the forward turrets) protected with a shield from blast damage from the main guns; 4 twin 5-inch (127mm) AA guns mounted on sponsons at the fore and aft end of the superstructure completed the armament.
Image

The second one increased the main guns to twelve 16.1-inch (409mm) guns and moved 4 of the 6 twin 6-inch (152mm) guns inside the armoured citadel; given the heavy armament and dimension, with lenght exceding 260 meters this design will almost certainly had broken treaty limits if built.
Image
Last edited by BB1987 on November 25th, 2012, 11:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
emperor_andreas
Posts: 3908
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#32 Post by emperor_andreas »

Love them...great work!
Image
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#33 Post by Thiel »

One can't help but wonder just how effective those five inch guns would have been.
Nice drawing of a most unusual ship though
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#34 Post by denodon »

Very unusual designs but also quite interesting. Kinda reminds me of the phrase in user experience design; designers aren't users, users aren't designers

Also those breakwaters forward are massive!
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
ALVAMA

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#35 Post by ALVAMA »

Awesome work, BB1987!
BB1987
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#36 Post by BB1987 »

denodon wrote:Also those breakwaters forward are massive!
Actually those where not breakwaters but shields to protect the forward 6-inch guns from blast damage from the 16.1-inch guns. (don't know why there was no such thing aft tough...)
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#37 Post by denodon »

Ah I see. Rather interesting design decision in that case.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
seeker36340
Posts: 617
Joined: June 9th, 2012, 10:21 pm

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#38 Post by seeker36340 »

Splendid drawings but what about stability with those short hulls compared to the superstructure?
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#39 Post by acelanceloet »

length has almost nothing to do with stability.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Japan - Never built IJN ships.

#40 Post by erik_t »

The IJN certainly entertained some entertaining ideas, if nothing else. One wonders about an exploding 6" magazine in service.
Post Reply