Page 4 of 21

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 8:28 pm
by rifleman
nighthunter wrote:Thanks, did you fix the Label and credits on your SSN? Also this is Era specific, 1970's-1980's not anything after.
think thats them sorted let me know

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 8:53 pm
by heuhen
Okay her we go:

Type: ASW with ASuW and AAW capability's
Displacement: Approx. 5,000 tons
Length: 396 feet (120.7 meters)
Beam: 52 feet (16 meters)
Drought: max: 22 feet (6.7 meters)

Propulsion:

2-shaft COGOG
2 Rolls-Royce Olympus TM3B high-speed gas turbines (54,000 shp / 40 MW)
2 Rolls-Royce Tyne RM1C cruise gas turbines (9,700 shp / 7.2 MW)

Speed: 31 knots
19 knots

Range: 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) at 19 kn; 3,300 nmi (6,100 km) at 31 kn

Complement: 140-280


Armament:

Capability to be equipped with most American and European weapon systems. see drawings bellow.
the standard weapon on them all is

1 * 76mm gun DP
2 * 30mm
2 * 12,7mm
2 * triple torpedo tubes
1 * quad sea sparrow launcher (with reload magazine Oslo class style).


Armor: limited Kevlar splinter protection in critical areas
Aircraft carried: 1+1 × Lynx, depends of mission


Terne III
Image

Mk-22 GMLS pic fixed!
Image

Mk-13 GMLS
Image

Mk-141
Image

Mk-141 max ASW
Image

ASROC
Image

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 9:05 pm
by Rainmaker
Very impressive. I like this design a lot. I'd be very interested in seeing a Canadianized version of this type to serve as an interim ASW escort between the Iroquois and Halifax classes. Certainly four of these could've replaced the Mackenzie-class destroyers, and also given MARCOM some serious air-defence capabilities before the Iroquois-class received the TRUMP refits in the mid-nineties.

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 9:39 pm
by nighthunter
TimothyC wrote:Nighthunter - COSAG or COGAS?
COGAS

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 9:53 pm
by rifleman
propulsion system: Combined steam and Gas turbine or Combined Gas Turbine?

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 9:56 pm
by nighthunter
I got it, yay for wikipedia! Thanks though rifleman.

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 10:47 pm
by heuhen
Have updated my list of NATO ASW with this one:

(See above or click this link!)
http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h37 ... 141max.png

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 11:20 pm
by rifleman
I wonder were these designs to act as Hunter Killer groups or to work as convoy escorts. It would be interesting to see what their support vessels would have been. I'm thinking Replenishment, C3I etc

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 15th, 2012, 11:52 pm
by erik_t
WM20 series ought to be able to illuminate for Sea Sparrow, heuhen. No need for both that and the separate illuminator (which means you can put the one you keep in a better position!).

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

Posted: March 16th, 2012, 12:01 am
by heuhen
erik_t wrote:WM20 series ought to be able to illuminate for Sea Sparrow, heuhen. No need for both that and the separate illuminator (which means you can put the one you keep in a better position!).
the idea was that the Sea Sparrow used a separate system for faster response time, but i agree with you that I can use the egg for that to.