NATO ASW Design Challenge

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
rifleman
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#31 Post by rifleman »

nighthunter wrote:Thanks, did you fix the Label and credits on your SSN? Also this is Era specific, 1970's-1980's not anything after.
think thats them sorted let me know
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#32 Post by heuhen »

Okay her we go:

Type: ASW with ASuW and AAW capability's
Displacement: Approx. 5,000 tons
Length: 396 feet (120.7 meters)
Beam: 52 feet (16 meters)
Drought: max: 22 feet (6.7 meters)

Propulsion:

2-shaft COGOG
2 Rolls-Royce Olympus TM3B high-speed gas turbines (54,000 shp / 40 MW)
2 Rolls-Royce Tyne RM1C cruise gas turbines (9,700 shp / 7.2 MW)

Speed: 31 knots
19 knots

Range: 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) at 19 kn; 3,300 nmi (6,100 km) at 31 kn

Complement: 140-280


Armament:

Capability to be equipped with most American and European weapon systems. see drawings bellow.
the standard weapon on them all is

1 * 76mm gun DP
2 * 30mm
2 * 12,7mm
2 * triple torpedo tubes
1 * quad sea sparrow launcher (with reload magazine Oslo class style).


Armor: limited Kevlar splinter protection in critical areas
Aircraft carried: 1+1 × Lynx, depends of mission


Terne III
Image

Mk-22 GMLS pic fixed!
Image

Mk-13 GMLS
Image

Mk-141
Image

Mk-141 max ASW
Image

ASROC
Image
Last edited by heuhen on March 16th, 2012, 9:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Rainmaker
Posts: 247
Joined: August 2nd, 2010, 6:12 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#33 Post by Rainmaker »

Very impressive. I like this design a lot. I'd be very interested in seeing a Canadianized version of this type to serve as an interim ASW escort between the Iroquois and Halifax classes. Certainly four of these could've replaced the Mackenzie-class destroyers, and also given MARCOM some serious air-defence capabilities before the Iroquois-class received the TRUMP refits in the mid-nineties.
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#34 Post by nighthunter »

TimothyC wrote:Nighthunter - COSAG or COGAS?
COGAS
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
rifleman
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#35 Post by rifleman »

propulsion system: Combined steam and Gas turbine or Combined Gas Turbine?
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#36 Post by nighthunter »

I got it, yay for wikipedia! Thanks though rifleman.
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#37 Post by heuhen »

Have updated my list of NATO ASW with this one:

(See above or click this link!)
http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h37 ... 141max.png
rifleman
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#38 Post by rifleman »

I wonder were these designs to act as Hunter Killer groups or to work as convoy escorts. It would be interesting to see what their support vessels would have been. I'm thinking Replenishment, C3I etc
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#39 Post by erik_t »

WM20 series ought to be able to illuminate for Sea Sparrow, heuhen. No need for both that and the separate illuminator (which means you can put the one you keep in a better position!).
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#40 Post by heuhen »

erik_t wrote:WM20 series ought to be able to illuminate for Sea Sparrow, heuhen. No need for both that and the separate illuminator (which means you can put the one you keep in a better position!).
the idea was that the Sea Sparrow used a separate system for faster response time, but i agree with you that I can use the egg for that to.
Post Reply