Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

Post all FD scale drawings here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#291 Post by nighthunter »

Well, as long as we inspired you, you inspired me. Got a few Allied nations interested in the Firebolt/Firestorm family. I'll post them in AU.
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
User avatar
Rowdy36
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#292 Post by Rowdy36 »

One for BCRenown:

Image
Image
Hood
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#293 Post by Hood »

Nice work, its a pity all modern stealthy aircraft look the same these days, buts its nicely drawn work as usual.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
User avatar
Trojan
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#294 Post by Trojan »

Fantastic job guys!
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
User avatar
BCRenown
Posts: 184
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#295 Post by BCRenown »

Nice one Rowdy and a big thank you too. As soon as my order for Furies is filled I'll be sending a note for Firebolts. Just have to check and see how much Monopoly money I have left. :lol:
Keep well and keep drawing,

Monty
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#296 Post by eswube »

Nice additions. :)
And I share Hood's sentiments about look of modern stealth aircraft. :( ;)
User avatar
Rowdy36
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#297 Post by Rowdy36 »

Some ground vehicles I've been working on, this family makes up the bulk of the Recherche Army armoured vehicle fleet:

Image
Top to bottom, left to right:
Scout/Light infantry support vehicle: 35mm main gun, 2 x TOW launchers (either side of the turret) and a 7.62mm coax.
Anti-aircraft/Anti-armour vehicle: Turret similar to the Avenger, equipped with Starstreak or TOW box launchers with 12.7mm machine guns below them. The box launchers can be switched out for rocket packs, 25mm guns or a number of other missiles.
Infantry support tank: 105mm L7 gun, 7.62mm coax and 12.7mm AA mg.
Self-propelled gun: 105mm L19 gun/howitzer.
Mortar vehicle: Twin 120mm mortars in an AMOS turret.

Image
Top to bottom, left to right:
Command vehicle,
Logistics vehicle,
APC: 12.7mm machine gun in a remote weapon system and up to 10 dismounts (normally just 8).
Ambulance vehicle.

I'm still not entirely sure where some of these vehicles fit into the force structure yet, but that will be figured out eventually...
Image
adenandy
Posts: 1633
Joined: July 23rd, 2011, 1:46 am

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#298 Post by adenandy »

VERY nice Rowdy :)

Well done matey :!:
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#299 Post by nighthunter »

They look good, Rowdy.

Infantry support tank? I thought that concept died out with the creation of the MBT? If it is light enough it could be an Airborne Infantry Support Tank?
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
User avatar
Rowdy36
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Commonwealth of Recherche in FD

#300 Post by Rowdy36 »

Thanks guys :)

Ideally the mechanised forces will always be operating with MBTs, especially since Recherche probably won't be using an IFV in the traditional sense (lacking an autocannon), but my thinking with the Infantry Support Tank is to support lighter forces (light infantry, airborne/air-mobile, marines). Particularly when deployed into areas that lack infrastructure capable of handling a 60t vehicle, and providing fire support in a similar manner to the Stryker MGS with the ability to tackle anything short of a modern MBT. The name is simply to distinguish it from MBTs and hopefully avoid it being used in tank on tank combat. I'm still working on weights and armour levels, though I'm thinking maybe about 25 tonnes at the base armour level? So it won't be C-130 portable but could be carried in the A400M and C-17.
Image
Post Reply