Nihon Kaigun 1946
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Last edited by BB1987 on May 1st, 2013, 11:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
- Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Ring kissing, BB1987?
Aside from a friendly jab, looks better than the 12 x 14" original work I've been playing with for a week or so now....I like the Alaskas, and I like this take on it.
Aside from a friendly jab, looks better than the 12 x 14" original work I've been playing with for a week or so now....I like the Alaskas, and I like this take on it.
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
You've left the aviation gas line on the hull, which doesn't make much sense as there's no aviation contingent on this ship (which also doesn't make sense). You should give it a stern catapult like the other BBs and cruisers.
There's no reason for this not to have a mainmast with an SP fighter direction radar. Place a large lattice mast just ahead of the aft Mk.38 director.
By 1945, I would expect that the catwalk around the armored conning tower would be enclosed. It might not have actual glass windows but it will still have an overhead canopy.
There's no reason for this not to have a mainmast with an SP fighter direction radar. Place a large lattice mast just ahead of the aft Mk.38 director.
By 1945, I would expect that the catwalk around the armored conning tower would be enclosed. It might not have actual glass windows but it will still have an overhead canopy.
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
uh?Navybrat85 wrote:Ring kissing, BB1987?
Aside from a friendly jab, looks better than the 12 x 14" original work I've been playing with for a week or so now....I like the Alaskas, and I like this take on it.
don't get me wrong, i'm not offended at all, but i simply did not get the joke
i've updated the drawing in the form of a rough WIP with some points amended and others not yet, so ican fix them again if they still don't work; moreover may i ask you if you have a clean version of the aircraft catapult? i've extracted it from your 1945 Guam, but because there was some superstructure behind it i don't know wich parts are to be deleted and wich not.Colosseum wrote:You've left the aviation gas line on the hull, which doesn't make much sense as there's no aviation contingent on this ship (which also doesn't make sense). You should give it a stern catapult like the other BBs and cruisers.
There's no reason for this not to have a mainmast with an SP fighter direction radar. Place a large lattice mast just ahead of the aft Mk.38 director.
By 1945, I would expect that the catwalk around the armored conning tower would be enclosed. It might not have actual glass windows but it will still have an overhead canopy.
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Yeah - it reminds me that I need to post the sheet of the Alaska specific parts so all the kitbashers can use it.
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
I don't mind at all...looks good so far!
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
The superstructure is just too tall. I feel like this ship would capsize in the first heavy seas...
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
The hull would be wider to accommodate the 14-inch gun turrets, so that might cancel out some of the problem.
-
- Posts: 440
- Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
I was getting that feeling too.Colosseum wrote:The superstructure is just too tall. I feel like this ship would capsize in the first heavy seas...
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
And yet nobody says anything about the Fusos...