USN Systems (02/26/2013)

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: USN Systems

#281 Post by Colosseum »

Various small USN items from several different drawings:

Image
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: USN Systems

#282 Post by Colosseum »

Sheet I made that explains USN WW2 surface combatant radar fits.

Image

Please inform me of any errors so I can correct them!
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USN Systems

#283 Post by erik_t »

Looks about right to me. The far-right side should probably say something about 'major combatants'; nothing Atlanta-sized or smaller could carry such a fit.
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: USN Systems

#284 Post by Colosseum »

Have updated, make sure to refresh.
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USN Systems

#285 Post by erik_t »

Quite nice.

I'd think about removing all of the extraneous parts and greebles, or blurring it all just a little bit, so that these masts can't be lifted part and parcel for terrible terrible kitbashes ;)

It's not quite a parts sheet, at least not the lower half.
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: USN Systems

#287 Post by Colosseum »

Did some work on the USN small directors. Info on this stuff would be much appreciated.

Image
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USN Systems

#288 Post by erik_t »

The standard Mk 56 has a weird broken window, blue-to-gray without frame. I've bashed my own, but it's probably not very accurate. Any thoughts?
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: USN Systems

#289 Post by Colosseum »

It's probably the right version then -- I don't think I even drew the Mk.56, I just placed it on there since I get all the Mark numbers confused.

The one above is from my personal sheet that I've had for ages so it's probably not the right one.
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USN Systems

#290 Post by erik_t »

It's the standard one; the problem is that the standard one is overdue for a redraw.
Post Reply