Page 27 of 50
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: November 29th, 2013, 4:54 pm
by eswube
Very fine work.
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: November 30th, 2013, 10:14 pm
by Karle94
My first FD scale aircraft, so go easy on me. It is a fighter plane for Skyrim; the Thrumufleygur, which means Thunderbolt. Despite it`s huge size, it was quite fast and nimble, especially at high altitudes. The plane had a 2300 hp turbo supercharged radial engine. Arnament is 6x13 mm machine guns. Top speed at 25,000 feet is 450mph (720 kmh.)
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: November 30th, 2013, 11:15 pm
by Rhade
Radials don't use radiator and oil cooler below the fuselage, only liquid-cooled do that.
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: November 30th, 2013, 11:53 pm
by Karle94
Those "radiators" are from radial engined planes, namely the Raiden and P-47. The coller below the fuselage may be a mistake though.
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: December 1st, 2013, 9:20 pm
by Blackbuck
That was chin, not fuselage mounted though. AFAIK the under-fuselage bumps and intakes on the 'Jug' are to do with the turbo-supercharger system.
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: December 1st, 2013, 11:06 pm
by Karle94
As it is here aswell. I`ve been thinking, there are no radiators on the plane so where you came up with that I don`t know
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: December 2nd, 2013, 1:48 pm
by Rhade
Karle94 wrote:As it is here aswell. I`ve been thinking, there are no radiators on the plane so where you came up with that I don`t know
Maybe one pic will say more then words.
What is this ?
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: December 2nd, 2013, 2:53 pm
by Karle94
Air intake for the turbo supercharger. I didn`t want one in the same config as the P-47, that would make the plane too big and heavy. So I chose to have it under the fuselage ala Mustang.
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: December 2nd, 2013, 3:48 pm
by Rhade
Yhym, ok now I understand.
Now I presume you will need to delete "nimble" part from description of plane. That intake will create some epic drag, there is a reason you know why big radial fighters don't use that kind of intakes under the fuselage.
Re: FD AU 2
Posted: December 2nd, 2013, 4:17 pm
by Karle94
What I meant is that it is nimble for it`s size and weight, not nimble as the A6M Zero. An interesting fact is that I used the A7M Reppan as a base referance to design this plane. I have seen no mention of the A7M here, so I might actually make that one.