Page 26 of 51
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: February 15th, 2012, 12:26 pm
by Thiel
Despite the fact that I have Lynxes and AW101s flying overhead on a daily basis it always surprises me just how big helicopters are compared to cars. And it's not as if Land Rovers are particularly small as cars goes.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: February 15th, 2012, 12:45 pm
by Clonecommander6454
Nice ship! But why they have a structure on the rear of the flight deck?
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: February 15th, 2012, 1:05 pm
by CanisD
She wasn't used as a carrier anymore, rather she was a maintenance ship, so having extra workshops was more important than having a clear deck.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: February 15th, 2012, 1:33 pm
by Clonecommander6454
That means Ocean is no longer a carrier, but more like a LPH?
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: February 15th, 2012, 2:49 pm
by Portsmouth Bill
Nice ones Cyril
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: February 15th, 2012, 5:59 pm
by Bombhead
CanisD wrote:She wasn't used as a carrier anymore, rather she was a maintenance ship, so having extra workshops was more important than having a clear deck.
Not quite Canis,that was Persius,Pioneer and later Triumph.At the time of Suez Ocean and Thesus were made into makeshift commando carriers.between them they landed 45 commando RM.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: February 15th, 2012, 8:55 pm
by Novice
Beautiful work on HMS Ocean, but there is some discrepancy between the top view and both side views. on the top view there are some lifeboats near the port-side edge which are not present in the side-views.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: March 3rd, 2012, 11:30 pm
by Bombhead
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: March 3rd, 2012, 11:41 pm
by deankal55
Bombhead, another flag issue. Canada didn't adopt the mapleleaf flag until 1964 and started using it in 1965. I think you should be using the Canadian red ensign.
Re: British carriers 50-85.
Posted: March 3rd, 2012, 11:45 pm
by Bombhead
deankal55 have you got a pic ?