Planebucket Discussion Thread
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
I'm working on various proposed versions of the CX-131, including an AEW version, attack version and a ASW version.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Very possibly not 100% accurate ergo why it's here and not the planebucket thread itself.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
GAH!
That A319 is still wrong. I'll need to double check the others, but an A319 should be exactly 222 pixels long.
That A319 is still wrong. I'll need to double check the others, but an A319 should be exactly 222 pixels long.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: August 25th, 2010, 1:01 pm
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
222,782256 px -> 223 px
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
No.
Here: http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/ ... fications/ lists the length as 111 feet, 0 inches. That's 222 pixels long exactly. This is why one should always use English/Imperial measurements whenever possible in shipbucket.
I am currently compiling a list of Airbus lengths from their website. I will have it up by later today.
Here: http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/ ... fications/ lists the length as 111 feet, 0 inches. That's 222 pixels long exactly. This is why one should always use English/Imperial measurements whenever possible in shipbucket.
I am currently compiling a list of Airbus lengths from their website. I will have it up by later today.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
And here it is for all major airbus aircraft:
Yeah, all of your A320 family is off. The A319 is simply the closest to scale. The A321 is off by 10 (short), the A320 is off by 9 (short), and the A318 is off by 6 (long).
The A330s are even worse! They all all 14 pixels short!
Yeah, all of your A320 family is off. The A319 is simply the closest to scale. The A321 is off by 10 (short), the A320 is off by 9 (short), and the A318 is off by 6 (long).
The A330s are even worse! They all all 14 pixels short!
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Remember what Colosseum did a while back whish started on the old board, a topic with parts, but what we can do is just the same idea but then with aircrafts. http://z11.invisionfree.com/shipbucket/ ... topic=2763erik_t wrote:If you want to tackle the problem, I'd love to see a good list of what's been drawn.
-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: August 25th, 2010, 1:01 pm
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Update the A320
- odysseus1980
- Posts: 3607
- Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
- Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Does anyone thought of designing Vickers VC-10?
-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: August 25th, 2010, 1:01 pm
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Update 330