Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

Post any drawings that are not one of the official Shipbucket formats here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Lebroba
Posts: 255
Joined: May 20th, 2012, 11:20 am
Location: Yokosuka, Japan

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#21 Post by Lebroba »

Update.

Image
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#22 Post by acelanceloet »

the funnel looks quite small, or are you going for all diesel propulsion?
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9105
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#23 Post by heuhen »

he have two funnels, one aft and one forward.

with probably: jet aft and diesel forward. similar to the Norwegian frigate, just an switch in the placement.
User avatar
Lebroba
Posts: 255
Joined: May 20th, 2012, 11:20 am
Location: Yokosuka, Japan

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#24 Post by Lebroba »

Yes. The area forward of the aft director will have two exhaust stocks from the two MT-30 gas turbines. The forward stacks are for the DG sets.
User avatar
Lebroba
Posts: 255
Joined: May 20th, 2012, 11:20 am
Location: Yokosuka, Japan

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#25 Post by Lebroba »

Minor update.

Image
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#26 Post by acelanceloet »

doesn't look too bad. keep in mind that you need some superstructure space with enough volume and area on the sides to put the gas turbine intakes on. (I don't see obvious places for them now, the funnels are too small to fit with intakes as well)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Lebroba
Posts: 255
Joined: May 20th, 2012, 11:20 am
Location: Yokosuka, Japan

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#27 Post by Lebroba »

Thanks. I will start cutting in the intakes and exhausts probably next week. My schedule has been hectic the last 5 weeks. The placement of the boat deck is giving me the most worry at the moment. I am hopeful it will work out.
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#28 Post by erik_t »

A little late to the thread, I guess... why not sponson the SLQ-32 off from the main deckhouse, like on Burke? This would seem to improve your SPY-1 arcs aft, and probably reduce crosstalk into the SLQ-32 receivers.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9105
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#29 Post by heuhen »

acelanceloet wrote:doesn't look too bad. keep in mind that you need some superstructure space with enough volume and area on the sides to put the gas turbine intakes on. (I don't see obvious places for them now, the funnels are too small to fit with intakes as well)

why not have the air intake on the superstructure.
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Just another U.S. Frigate - 3D WiP

#30 Post by erik_t »

That's certainly how I'd do it. You'd prefer to be able to lift the gas turbine cores themselves right up out of the intake plenums, and the gas turbines themselves are presumably to port and starboard, like how a Burke is arranged.
Post Reply