HMCS Annapolis - 1996

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#21 Post by acelanceloet »

the main search radar is really an complete solid antenna? without any girders or so?

for the director, that looks great, I just wanted it separate from railings etc as part for use on other drawings in the future ;)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#22 Post by erik_t »

Sure looks smooth to me, at least on the obverse side.

Image

Hazegray has a few more pictures.
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#23 Post by Novice »

Great drawing, the rendition of pilot house and fore deck curves superbly done. One minor nitpick concerns the scuttles, as the need to have black outline, and not gray (and I'm not sure about the color of windows and scuttles), these for the scuttles on main deck house below the mast. Also check the Sea-King's markings- they appear to belong to Pakistan (or Nigeria, if the green color is indicative).
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
User avatar
KimWerner
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#24 Post by KimWerner »

Beautiful drawing :D
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms
seeker36340
Posts: 617
Joined: June 9th, 2012, 10:21 pm

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#25 Post by seeker36340 »

Splendid work...brings back some nice memories of working with the Candians. Always where they were supposed to be and very professional. My only questions is tne color, which I remember as being a bit greener that this. Of course, that was 40 years ago *sigh*
User avatar
BCRenown
Posts: 184
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#26 Post by BCRenown »

Thanks guys.

I seem to remember a hint of green as well. Perhaps this is closer to the correct colour?

Image
Last edited by BCRenown on February 20th, 2014, 8:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Keep well and keep drawing,

Monty
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#27 Post by erik_t »

I have been wondering if the shading underneath the helo pad isn't a bit dark.
User avatar
BCRenown
Posts: 184
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#28 Post by BCRenown »

Actually, erik-t, I was wondering if the shading was dark enough. :)

Image
Keep well and keep drawing,

Monty
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#29 Post by acelanceloet »

yes, it looks like that in real life, but right now it looks like it is painted dark blue in that area. for that reason why have the overhang shading in sb instead of darkening the entire section.
a bit of darkening is not bad, but don't overdo it ;)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
BCRenown
Posts: 184
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#30 Post by BCRenown »

I'm sorry acelanceloet, but I have to disagree.

If it looks like that in real life, why do it any different in the drawing? After all, isn't the whole idea to capture the essence of the ship?
Keep well and keep drawing,

Monty
Post Reply