USS John Kendrick class FFG
Moderator: Community Manager
-
Obsydian Shade
- Posts: 797
- Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
- Contact:
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
Looking much better! It will be interesting to see the final configuration.
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!
If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.
Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.
"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.
Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.
"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
-
nighthunter
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
Mk 29's were used in 1973, so hush. XP
Shade, you mean the Last modernization?
Shade, you mean the Last modernization?
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
-
Obsydian Shade
- Posts: 797
- Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
- Contact:
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
Indeed, the final modernization.
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!
If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.
Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.
"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.
Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.
"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
-
nighthunter
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
Soon, my friend, soon.
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
-
nighthunter
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
And here they are, the 1990 modernization, shown in 1992 shortly after Desert Shield/Storm:
And the final modernization, as of 2004, when she received the new Mk-54 MAKO ASW Torpedoes.
And the final modernization, as of 2004, when she received the new Mk-54 MAKO ASW Torpedoes.
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
-
gordo8000
- Posts: 511
- Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
- Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
Don't think that the US Navy would be using the old Mk112 ASROC Launcher in 2004.
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU
-
Obsydian Shade
- Posts: 797
- Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
- Contact:
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
Is it possible to squeeze in some Mk 41 cells with VL ASROC? You wouldn't need that many of them. Other than that, looking very good. Me being me, I'd try to find somewhere to squeeze in a RAM launcher. Perhaps an extension to the fantail for it to perch on?
Even if you keep the old launcher to have Harpoon as well, spares shouldn't be hard to come by, with all the vessels from that era going to the knackers during the 90s. I think Japan still uses it as well, so could likely get spares from them, assuming that you weren't the one providing them with theirs to begin with....
Even if you keep the old launcher to have Harpoon as well, spares shouldn't be hard to come by, with all the vessels from that era going to the knackers during the 90s. I think Japan still uses it as well, so could likely get spares from them, assuming that you weren't the one providing them with theirs to begin with....
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!
If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.
Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.
"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.
Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.
"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
-
acelanceloet
- Posts: 7514
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
you might want to update the SLQ-32 with the different versions as well.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
No.Obsydian Shade wrote:Is it possible to squeeze in some Mk 41 cells with VL ASROC?
Actually, very no.
Re: USS John Kendrick class FFG
I'm not even sure you'll be able to squeeze the aforementioned vertical reloading system in.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.