HMS Agincourt (1914)

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Clonecommander6454
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#21 Post by Clonecommander6454 »

But what will happen to those boats during a full broadside slavo? Something interesting might happen...
User avatar
jabba
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#22 Post by jabba »

Clonecommander6454 wrote:Oh Nice! But how exactly and why are the boats placed in such a interesting location?
The flying boat deck, as Heuhen said was to make the most of the deck space. The RN did away with it shortly after commissioning, and boats were stowed on deck.

Regarding concussive effects from the 12"ers, being near the centreline and above, I guess they would be Ok.

Image

Image
User avatar
bezobrazov
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#23 Post by bezobrazov »

Superb! I'm going to check the 1914 boat complement. It may be that you could lack one or two types that I've drawn since posting that parts sheet. If so, I'll make it good by sending them to you!
Anyhoo...at Jutland there were a betting going on among gunnery officers that when the 'Gin Palace' opened up a full 14-gun salvo she'd turn turtle by the effect of the blast and recoil. Instead she proved to be a very steady gun platform with but little roll.
She was an impressive vessel, though wholly unsuited to face other battleships on even terms, due to her thin sides (9" armor).
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
User avatar
Biancini1995
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#24 Post by Biancini1995 »

Wow you will make the Rio de Janeiro?!?!
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#25 Post by acelanceloet »

Biancini1995 wrote:Wow you will make the Rio de Janeiro?!?!
seriously....
jabba wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:will we also see Rio de Janeiro and sultan Osman 1 versions? :P
Maybe eventually, but I'm sticking with WWI RN vessels for now...
page one. READ!
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
bezobrazov
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#26 Post by bezobrazov »

If Jabba is ok with it, I can fix the RdeJ and SO1, so that no one have to ask...
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#27 Post by Colosseum »

This is really good work. I never even knew this ship existed - turns out I know next to nothing about the Great War despite my extensive knowledge of the second world war... something I need to fix. ;)
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#28 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

From page 170 of The Fighting Ships In the Royal Navy by E.H.H. Archibald:

Image

What impressess is the cost of these these warships to nations that could ill afford them; but as Archibald explains, they served well with the Grand Fleet :)
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#29 Post by heuhen »

from Istanbul naval museum

Image
User avatar
jabba
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...

Re: HMS Agincourt (1914)

#30 Post by jabba »

Ooh, that is pretty! I may have to draw it myself!!! Thankyou!
Post Reply