Battlecarrier Ultima

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#21 Post by Wolfman »

I think it's because her role has shifted more towards amphibious assault. Am I right, ALVAMA?
ALVAMA

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#22 Post by ALVAMA »

Wolfman wrote:I think it's because her role has shifted more towards amphibious assault. Am I right, ALVAMA?
Yes, you are! Since people told me, it doesn't make sence I have removed them!
User avatar
Rhade
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#23 Post by Rhade »

You fraking maniac, you have a pact with some evil forces to create this level of wonders ?! :lol: Broncos and Skyriders are amazing ... ALVAMAZING! :D
Image
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
ALVAMA

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#24 Post by ALVAMA »

hahaha Thank-you alot Rhade hahaha
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#25 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

It is absurd, but yes, magnificent :lol:
User avatar
Biancini1995
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#26 Post by Biancini1995 »

hey ALVAMA if you can draw the deck please :)
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#27 Post by heuhen »

Watching this from my mobile and screamed out hard: WOW in the city around some girls :-D
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#28 Post by Wolfman »

ALVAMA wrote:
Wolfman wrote:I think it's because her role has shifted more towards amphibious assault. Am I right, ALVAMA?
Yes, you are! Since people told me, it doesn't make sence I have removed them!
The only quibbles I have with her is that her PRIFLY doesn't look to have enough height to watch the entire deck and the fact that some her radar is sited right aft of the funnel. I suggest raising PRIFLY a couple of decks and I'm not sure what could be done about the funnel, unless thar particular radar antenna is sponsoned off to the starboard away from the funnel. Now, backdate the longer flightdeck to the WWII version and then it'll be a more solid design.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#29 Post by acelanceloet »

heuhen wrote:Watching this from my mobile and screamed out hard: WOW in the city around some girls :-D
what I am wondering about now... what was the girls reaction :P most girls aren't amused if I state I am an bucketeer haha :P
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Battlecarrier Ultima

#30 Post by erik_t »

The Sea Sparrow directors are point backwards in every case. The number of Mk 66 is probably unsupportable; when I was talking with Timothy I was envisioning perhaps a maximum of three mounts on either beam.

The 3/50s should probably have GUNAR (they don't appear to in this case). An after 3/50 director seems necessary.
Post Reply