RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

This is a forum for newbies and beginners to post their first designs. Please note that this forum is only for Shipbucket and FD scale projects.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#21 Post by erik_t »

Novice wrote:GW 96 was done by Hood Here, when we was known as Tornado. Also Here, you'll find a waterline model of the ship, although she isn't idetified as GW96. Mihoshik has also done a version in the alternate universe thread.
Wait, seriously!?
ALVAMA

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#22 Post by ALVAMA »

erik_t wrote:
Novice wrote:GW 96 was done by Hood Here, when we was known as Tornado. Also Here, you'll find a waterline model of the ship, although she isn't idetified as GW96. Mihoshik has also done a version in the alternate universe thread.
Wait, seriously!?
Yeas, his what-if name.
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#23 Post by Thiel »

I'm certain he meant to say he and not me
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#24 Post by Bombhead »

Good effort trap one.The shading on the A and B turrets should be reversed as you have shaded the hull and superstructure.With a bit of tidying up this could make a good drawing.Keep at it. 8-)
Hood
Posts: 7234
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#25 Post by Hood »

Progress is good. This is starting to look even better.

Yes, Tornado is my alter-ego over at What-If Modellers.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#26 Post by Bombhead »

It's hard to make a fully functioning warship from a design sketch.Have a look at this.If you look at how Portsmouth Bill has drawn this you will pick up good hints and tips. viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1088&start=30
trap one
Posts: 27
Joined: June 12th, 2011, 5:49 pm

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#27 Post by trap one »

Updated and I think a good representation of the drawing that was published in "Vanguard to Trident". Anything else is just me speculating.
Last edited by trap one on August 22nd, 2011, 6:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#28 Post by heuhen »

do not know why but I like the lines on the boat!
ALVAMA

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#29 Post by ALVAMA »

Do you have seen my comment? Also no shade under a single black line. Sould be 3 like the floor with life rafts..
trap one
Posts: 27
Joined: June 12th, 2011, 5:49 pm

Re: RN 1950's proposed cruiser GW96A

#30 Post by trap one »

ALVAMA wrote:Do you have seen my comment? Also no shade under a single black line. Sould be 3 like the floor with life rafts..
Sorry haven't seen any post other than the 3 pixels under the life raft posts.
As for the shading under the single black line around the top of the Bridge. I was just going with the poor drawing that showed heavy shading in this area. Almost as if there is a small over hang in these areas, but it didn't appear to be a major one so I followed the guidelines here.
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=16 Para 3 last sentence.
Post Reply