Shipbucket

Rather than using light grey for the rotors which looks hideous, I'd go with single width black instead.

Little Bird wrote:KimWerner, see here please:

http://z11.invisionfree.com/shipbucket/ ... =442&st=30

Ooh! I've could save some hours of working if I'd knew this site. It gives me great pleasure to look at all these variants of AW-101/EH-101 and I'm also satisfied, that my own drawing is very simular to the UK's! But!!! When I compare (both with pictures and drawings) I'll think my drawing is slightly more correct, especially with the main rotor, but also in details with the landing wheels canopy and search radar etc. Thiel had suggested the side rotor shown with a single black circle (which diameter is exact 4 m). I can see that is the standard, so I'll correct that

I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.

acelanceloet wrote:I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.

That's all right, but if 10 m are 65 pix then 22,8 m are 148-149 pix. I've really measured the Merlin out, because I know you are a very skilled judge That's the reason why I have the "pixel-box" in red on my drawing. It makes it easier to count

KimWerner wrote:

acelanceloet wrote:I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.

That's all right, but if 10 m are 65 pix then 22,8 m are 148-149 pix. I've really measured the Merlin out, because I know you are a very skilled judge That's the reason why I have the "pixel-box" in red on my drawing. It makes it easier to count

My question is this: what is the dimension you are working off of, and are you sure that you have it correct?

We had a recent 'incident' with the H-60 length which was solved by going to Jane's and checking the various lengths that were delineated there.

TimothyC wrote:We had a recent 'incident' with the H-60 length which was solved by going to Jane's and checking the various lengths that were delineated there.

We should sticky that as a reminder. And this is also why you only scale a ship off of other objects only when it's the only option.

TimothyC wrote:

KimWerner wrote:

acelanceloet wrote:I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.

That's all right, but if 10 m are 65 pix then 22,8 m are 148-149 pix. I've really measured the Merlin out, because I know you are a very skilled judge That's the reason why I have the "pixel-box" in red on my drawing. It makes it easier to count

My question is this: what is the dimension you are working off of, and are you sure that you have it correct?

We had a recent 'incident' with the H-60 length which was solved by going to Jane's and checking the various lengths that were delineated there.

I'm using the dimensions from AW: Overall length 22,8 m (= 148-149 pix), tailrotor diameter 4 m (= 26 pix) total hight o wheel 7 m (= 45-46 pix) etc.

I have upgrade the old AW101 because effectively too much large:

Good work Little Bird !

Greetings.

WhyMe wrote:Kawanishi E7K spotter floatplane

Can you re-post it with white background, and not transparent, for those of us who use MS-Paint?