Project DX

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Project DX

#131 Post by erik_t »

Unless a source specifically states it, I'd be very surprised at within-hull SVTT on a ship with no helicopters. Without the organic helo, you aren't going to have a very big magazine at all, and so you won't want to devote such valuable full-beam space to them. I think external tubes are most likely, although something like the Knox installation is possible.

Of course, maybe I'm completely wrong and that was actually the plan.

I'd also like to see a RAS kingpost near the fueling station, like so:

Image
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Project DX

#132 Post by acelanceloet »

erik_t wrote:Unless a source specifically states it, I'd be very surprised at within-hull SVTT on a ship with no helicopters. Without the organic helo, you aren't going to have a very big magazine at all, and so you won't want to devote such valuable full-beam space to them. I think external tubes are most likely, although something like the Knox installation is possible.

Of course, maybe I'm completely wrong and that was actually the plan.

I'd also like to see a RAS kingpost near the fueling station, like so:

Image
agreed on both points. should be fixed now.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Project DX

#133 Post by erik_t »

Thumbs up!
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Project DX

#134 Post by acelanceloet »

Image
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Project DX

#135 Post by eswube »

Very interesting series!
Hood
Posts: 7237
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Project DX

#136 Post by Hood »

Nice additions.
These ships have a very long and thin appearance. How beamy were they?
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
acelanceloet
Posts: 7514
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Project DX

#137 Post by acelanceloet »

here ya go, completed this miniseries, and added it to the first post. please comment if you see any errors ;)

DG/AEGIS
ASMS, the system that became the present AEGIS was first conceived in 1963, when it became clear that Typhon would not lead to results. Development started slow, but in 1969 it became Aegis. The cost concentrated in the advanced fire control computers and radars, as in Typhon, but even more so in the Aegis system because it used the standard missile instead of a new developed missile.
In 1969 the only missile ship under development was DXGN, as DXG was dropped. Because of that, ASMS was designed to be fitted on a nuclear destroyer or cruiser of 10000 tons displacement. When Admiral Zumwalt became CNO, he was determined to increase the amount of combatant ships by designing low-cost ships, which was enforced by unit-cost and unit-displacement limits. DXGN of course did not fit in this plan: nuclear vessels were just too expensive to build in the numbers required.
Zumwalt wanted a low-cost Aegis vessel, and the limits were set as $ 100 million and 5000 tons. Of the 139 computer runs of the first series, only one design was within these limits
Image
This vessel had just an Mk 22 launcher, a helideck and Aegis on board. This was considered too austere even for Zumwalt, so new limits were set.

These limits were set at $ 125 million and 6000 tons, which proved to be more realistic. Within these limits, the design considered varied considerably. At first it was to have an austere sonar suite and provision for landing a helicopter, but no hangar. The SPS-49 search radar was deleted. The launcher would have been the Mk 26 Mod 1, which allowed the ship to fire ASROC and Harpoon as well, next to the SM-2MR
Image

Critics argued that so valuable a ship should have at least 2 launchers. This resulted in a design with 2 Mk 13 launchers, which could not fire ASROC. LAMPS and SPS-49 were added, and this resulted in a vessel of 6161 tons and $ 136,1 million, both of which exceeded Zumwalts limits. This, and the lack of growth space in the Mk 13 launcher, made that this design was not satisfactory either, and a return to the Mk 26 was made, this time the Mod 2 with room for 64 missiles.
Image
Image
In the end, this resulted in the vessel shown underneath, the FY74 model, the only one about which exact dimensions are known.
Image
Displacement: 5884,3 tons
Length WL: 148,74
Beam: 16,15
Draft: 4,94
Power: 70000shp
Top speed: 29,4 knots
The cost of this variant rose though, and was not at $ 200 million. This would only get worse over time, but it was clear this was the minimal platform that could support the fleet with effective Aegis air defence.
However, within the navy there were still plans for nuclear ships, and it was considered if it would not be better to have only one class of first line combatants. This, in effect, was a return to the original ASMS/DXGN plan. The nuclear ships were too expensive to build in numbers though, so it was proposed to have 8 nuclear strike cruisers and 16 conventional powered DDG-47 class ships, based on the Spruance hull. In retrospect, this was a fortunate turn of events, as we can see on the resulting Ticonderoga class; it would not have been easy to put a combat system designed for 10000 tons on a 6000 ton hull.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Project DX

#138 Post by eswube »

Great series!
Graham1973
Posts: 137
Joined: September 18th, 2011, 2:20 pm

Re: Project DX

#139 Post by Graham1973 »

I just finished reading the OP and I would like to congratulate acelanceloet on creating a very informative set of posts. The research work shown is very impressive.
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3609
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Project DX

#140 Post by odysseus1980 »

Remarkable thread, very informative under impressive research. Congratulations acelanceloet!
Post Reply