REINO DE ESPAÑA

[bezobrazov]

Está bien con un traductor electrónico porque la mayoría aquí no puede comprender el español. Va a recibir más ayuda si escribe en inglés. Por ejemplo yo no puedo escribir ni leer en español. Tuve que pedir ayuda de mi esposa (y Ella es mucho más inteligente que yo )

[alejandro]

how do you traslate this word?" el casco del ship.
thank.

[acelanceloet]

the hull of the ship, I think.
I suppose you don't mean casco as in unfinished ship.

[alejandro]

[travestytrav25]

Hmm, interesting. Well, first of all, your rudder looks like it belongs on a sailboat, not a warship. I don't think it's big enough to effectively turn the ship, and rudders generally don't extend below the keel line. Your bulbous bow is weird and I'm not sure it would provide your ship with any benefit, but I'll leave that to someone with more hull-design experience to comment on further. Also, what in god's name are all those things covering the side of your superstructure? Whether they're portholes, or liferafts, or whatever, they shouldn't be there. It's not necessarily wrong, but I've never seen a Mk 13 and a Mk 26 missile launcher combined on the same ship. If you're going to have an ASROC launcher you need a sonar of some kind. You can't fire an ASROC if you can't find the sub. Your anchors look a bit small too. Other than those critiques, your above-water hull actually looks pretty good, although it looks more like an OPV or an ocean escort than...whatever you have it classified as.

[alejandro]

Hmm, interesting. Well, first of all, your rudder looks like it belongs on a sailboat, not a warship. I don't think it's big enough to effectively turn the ship, and rudders generally don't extend below the keel line. Your bulbous bow is weird and I'm not sure it would provide your ship with any benefit, but I'll leave that to someone with more hull-design experience to comment on further. Also, what in god's name are all those things covering the side of your superstructure? Whether they're portholes, or liferafts, or whatever, they shouldn't be there. It's not necessarily wrong, but I've never seen a Mk 13 and a Mk 26 missile launcher combined on the same ship. If you're going to have an ASROC launcher you need a sonar of some kind. You can't fire an ASROC if you can't find the sub. Your anchors look a bit small too. Other than those critiques, your above-water hull actually looks pretty good, although it looks more like an OPV or an ocean escort than...whatever you have it classified as.

thank¡¡

The boat is patrol

[alejandro]

[alejandro]

[Raxar]

You're going to need a lot of shading on that sub. I'm no expert in anything post-1950, but I'm pretty sure that 10 torpedo tubes is too much. Also, the hump behind the island is for missile tubes, as seen on the Ohio Class, as well as other SSB's and SSBN's. If you're misssile tubes are in front, as tehy are now, the hump syould be infront of the island.

[erik_t]

You've very clearly taken large portions of other users' drawings. You must credit these people when you use large portions of their drawings. This is not optional.