Grays Harbor Designs

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1221 Post by Zephyr »

some more done. it may be close to finished now, that is if nothing particularly disturbing and/or bizarre is spotted.

Image

Question - What size air group? I was thinking somewhere in the range of 48-56?
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1222 Post by Zephyr »

Yeah, I know I said I didn't want to get sidetracked from the WSF, but I've had this for some time now and saw it in my folder last night and went ahead and finished (I think) it.

The C-210 class container vessel was designed as a coastal and inter-island container ship able to load and unload in smaller ports which do not have regular container docking facilities. Used mostly in the Colonies and some Dominions, this class has been purchased by several shipping lines. As each has their own requirements, each shipping lines C-210's are slightly different. Some have moving cranes, some have a stationary crane, such as this one. Capacity of these small container ships is 75 TEU.

This is an example of one of 3 ships purchased by Cynhwysydd Lines, who operate primarily in the Equatorial Islands Colonies.

Image
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1223 Post by acelanceloet »

those angled lines in the superstructure add a lot of cost and cost a lot in space. the azimuth thruster also cost a lot space and money, while it adds not that much. the hull shape looks more like that of an landing craft instead of the blocky shape of container ships, is that intentional?
ow and, the crane cannot rotate over the the side of the containers because the cilinder will get in the way.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1224 Post by Zephyr »

so I'll either raise it or change it to some other type... referring to the crane.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1225 Post by acelanceloet »

more or less, yeah. most likely both :P
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Rhade
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1226 Post by Rhade »

Zephyr wrote:Question - What size air group? I was thinking somewhere in the range of 48-56?
Carrier is more in Brits armored style or Yanks wooden deck?
Image
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1227 Post by Zephyr »

amoured deck
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Rhade
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1228 Post by Rhade »

I would say 48 is reasonable number. Now what role this carrier have, more ASW, land support or other?
Image
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1229 Post by Zephyr »

By the mid/late 1930's the fleet carriers such as this provided a combination of fleet fighter air protection, both long-range and CAP, plus bomber (torpedo & dive) as a strike force against enemy warships, port facilities and coverage for marine landings. By 1941 as light carriers became available, the CVL's of the Wyvern Class provided the fighter cover for the fleet while the CV/CVA's were the hammer, the strike forces. Carrier Groups of the 1940's were frequently organized with 1 or 2 Fleet Carriers and one Light Carrier + various cruisers and destroyers as escort. Battle groups were esentially similar, but with BB's or BC's as well. CVE's of the Quinn Bay Class were the convoy escort/ASW carriers. Some Wyvern's also provided strike missions for lower threat areas.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1230 Post by Zephyr »

acelanceloet wrote:more or less, yeah. most likely both :P
ok, any suggestion on appropriate crane types?
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Post Reply