The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
KIKE92
Posts: 546
Joined: July 26th, 2012, 12:29 pm
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#121 Post by KIKE92 »

WOW this is just getting better and better. Just one question, how do you make those sheets?.
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#122 Post by Blackbuck »

They're all done in Excel, the magic of formatting!
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
No Gods, Only Monsters
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#123 Post by eswube »

Very nice. :)
So I see that in Your AU You've taken the practice of giving brigades (apparently multi-battalion formations) the names sounding like British Army regiments (of battalion size).
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#124 Post by Blackbuck »

Correct, originally it was just the Guards units that were to become brigade sized formations but with the advent of the brigade combat team doctrine it made sense to flesh out the other regiments into brigades. As they keep do keep their core regiments they are technically worthy of their naming convention. It's mainly the extra additions which upscale them into brigade territory (organic reconnaissance, artillery etc) rather than a true Brigade in the British sense with multiple regiments.

There are still the odd regiments here and there, mainly artillery and armoured as well as support units units but most of the 'building blocks of war' are combat teams.

Also of note is there are administrative divisions such as the Household Division mentioned in the PDF, the others I've yet to name up but they are there...

~Mark.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
No Gods, Only Monsters
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#125 Post by Blackbuck »

Image

Something to ponder - Shown as ever on the eve of war, a provisional study of a Mod.1929 Treaty Cruiser. A Nottingham class if you will... (half way between a York and a Northampton!)

- 9,250t Standard
- 570ft*67ft*20ft ~WL
- 32kts Max. 15kt Long-range cruise.
- 10,000nmi cruising radius

- 100mm external belt over machinery and boilers
- 70mm internal boxes over magazines and barbettes
- 30-60mm deck plating
- 25mm closing bulkheads
- 25mm plating over bridges fore and aft

- 3*3 8"/50 of either French or British origin.
- 4*2 4"/45 (replaces earlier single mounts)
- 6*1 40mm/60 Bofors replacing single pom-poms
- 4*2 13.2mm Hotchkiss (later Browning) HMGs
- 2*3 550mm TT sets
- 1x Floatplane, in this case a Vindicator.

I'm not 100% happy with how they look but hey ho.

~Mark.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
No Gods, Only Monsters
User avatar
Rowdy36
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#126 Post by Rowdy36 »

That's a fantastic looking cruiser Blackbuck! :)
Image
Cybermax
Posts: 331
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:41 pm

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#127 Post by Cybermax »

Nice cruiser! It is realistic and believable.
JSB
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#128 Post by JSB »

Very nice cruiser,
My only comments would be why bother with 13.2mm Hotchkiss and I'm not sure pre war officer would accept 40mm on turret roofs (why not put 2 on each side of the forward funnel ?) and maybe a hangar for the seaplane if you are in N Atlantic ?
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#129 Post by Blackbuck »

Thanks all!

Because 23mm cannon are somewhat hard to come by before the outbreak of hostilities ditto 13.2mm Brownings, so stockpiles of Hotchkiss MGs would be what we'd have available for use.
I'd also think that I'd much rather keep my firing arcs intact than have to cater to the whims of individuals. As for a hangar, if you can find a way to add a sizable chunk of top-weight large enough to hold a Vindicator or N-3PB be my guest I'd have included one if I thought I could fit one on there.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
No Gods, Only Monsters
Krakatoa
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen

#130 Post by Krakatoa »

That is a very nice blend of UK early 30's cruiser designs B.B.

So why didn't we see it in the South American Challenge? Tol Galen not building ships for export?

It is a powerful ship in that 10,000 ton class. It is not just topweight stopping a hangar but also treaty considerations with the ship already being at the top end of the scales.
Post Reply