FD AU 3

Post all FD scale drawings here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD AU 3

#121 Post by eswube »

Nice idea. :)
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: FD AU 3

#122 Post by Novice »

Interesting concept, and the color themes are nice,... wait... no they are great!!
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Hood
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: FD AU 3

#123 Post by Hood »

An excellent idea and they results look great.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: FD AU 3

#124 Post by nighthunter »

Thanks guys!
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
Karle94
Posts: 2135
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland

Re: FD AU 3

#125 Post by Karle94 »

I present the first MBT of the Roman army, the Type L Loricatus, or in English, the Armored Vehicle Type 50. Developed in the early 60s to counter newer and more modern tanks developed by the enemies of Rome. The tank itself is a cross between the Leopard 1, MBT-70 and the Type 74 Nana-yon.

Image
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD AU 3

#126 Post by eswube »

Nice drawing.
Just the turret makes impression of being somewhat small relative to hull (and machine gun of being HUGE).
Karle94
Posts: 2135
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland

Re: FD AU 3

#127 Post by Karle94 »

The turret is relatively small compared to most tanks of the era. The hull of my type L has the length of the Leopard 1. The Type 74, though based on the Leopard 1 hull wise is smaller. Either way, smaller turret = less hits. You can see the turret here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... nk_-_2.jpg

The MG is the Ma Deuce with the stock of the MG-42 and a trigger on the underside of the gun.
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: FD AU 3

#128 Post by odysseus1980 »

According to this page of Flight Global International (http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/ ... 10%20super) an even larger VC.10 was considered. Would carry 222 passengers. Perhaps this varaint would combine the long fuselage of the BEA Short Haul VC.10 with the larger wing of "regular" airframe and maximum 230 seats. This could be moved in What-if British Aircraft thread. I named it Super-300 (as a follow on eswube's designation of Super-200).

http://s21.postimg.org/sxab1orhj/vicker ... er_300.png

I made the design before my vacation.

Design itself is exactly that described above, the long airframe (~196ft) with the standard 44,5m wingspan. Sorry for the resized picture, it is well above Post Image capacity, will reposted when Majhost is open again (now is down for maintenance).
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD AU 3

#129 Post by eswube »

Majhost's "down for maintenance" periods are a price to pay for it's simple operation. :/
Nice work - essentialy a fuselage of VC.10 Short Haul without shortened wings.
There was a number of variations on the VC.10 design considered, but many of them are quite obscure source-wise.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: FD AU 3

#130 Post by heuhen »

eswube wrote:Majhost's "down for maintenance" periods are a price to pay for it's simple operation. :/
Nice work - essentialy a fuselage of VC.10 Short Haul without shortened wings.
There was a number of variations on the VC.10 design considered, but many of them are quite obscure source-wise.
dropbox is almost never down. tihi :lol:
Post Reply