NATO ASW Design Challenge

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#121 Post by Blackbuck »

It's actually a rather old name from the age of sail so not really...
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#122 Post by heuhen »

TimothyC wrote:
heuhen wrote:
TimothyC wrote:I'm starting my write ups on everyones work, so details people, details.
Are the enough details on mine!?!
Oh Lord yes.

I don't need any more details from you. I'd rather not be buried under a mountain of text (I mean this in a good way).

In case you don't see it, Behind a combined railing and gangway bellow the hangar deck aft, there are triple torpedo tubes. one on each side.
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#123 Post by Thiel »

SHIPDUDE wrote:"HMS Black Joke" probably isn't the best name for modern multicultural Britain!
Why? It's not a racial slur or anything. Black joke = Gallows humour. Given their mission it's actually rather suitable.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
SHIPDUDE
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#124 Post by SHIPDUDE »

What did the black kid get on his A levels?

Etc, etc.

Nevertheless, I'm sure the hundreds of thousands of black UK citizens would be fine with it! :?
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#125 Post by denodon »

Well here is my new entry so far. I'm guessing with the weapons systems and have no idea what sensors I need so could anyone help in that regard? I'm also thinking of putting a torpedo tube in the hull opening but I have no idea what kind.

Image

And yes I did go with the Meko inspired idea as whilst the ships don't look sleek they are a good base.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#126 Post by Blackbuck »

I think MConrad should be on that credit line... It's a MEKO 360 pixel for pixel with his...
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#127 Post by denodon »

Yeah I'm going to add him as a credit once I'm further in. I'm just using the cleaned template standard I always use currently. Just need to alter that part before completing it. It's actually a MEKO 360 with Bridge and aft mast structure from the Anzac Class and the underwater hull is a stretched Anzac again.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#128 Post by Blackbuck »

denodon wrote:Yeah I'm going to add him as a credit once I'm further in. I'm just using the cleaned template standard I always use currently. Just need to alter that part before completing it. It's actually a MEKO 360 with Bridge and aft mast structure from the Anzac Class and the underwater hull is a stretched Anzac again.
Fair enough. A point about the design, where you have the goalkeeper atm means you have no access to the hangar. I'd flank CIWS either side like on the actual MEKOs unless you were going to mount something without any penetration up there.
SHIPDUDE wrote:What did the black kid get on his A levels?

Etc, etc.

Nevertheless, I'm sure the hundreds of thousands of black UK citizens would be fine with it! :?
I'm one and I'm fine with it because it's a historic name. Just leave it alone already.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#129 Post by denodon »

Side by side should work if I have the beam (I'd imagine so). I did consider that there might be more beneath the goalkeepers but couldn't think of just how much. I know the 4.5in Mk 8 on the bow needs three decks clearance below at least.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge

#130 Post by acelanceloet »

GK: about 1,5 deck penetration for the gun, reload room on the deck directly underneath the gun. also, they are way too expensive to have 2 on the hangar next to each other (especially considering this is an ASW ship)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Post Reply