NATO ASW Design Challenge
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
It's actually a rather old name from the age of sail so not really...
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
- heuhen
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
- Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
TimothyC wrote:Oh Lord yes.heuhen wrote:Are the enough details on mine!?!TimothyC wrote:I'm starting my write ups on everyones work, so details people, details.
I don't need any more details from you. I'd rather not be buried under a mountain of text (I mean this in a good way).
In case you don't see it, Behind a combined railing and gangway bellow the hangar deck aft, there are triple torpedo tubes. one on each side.
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Why? It's not a racial slur or anything. Black joke = Gallows humour. Given their mission it's actually rather suitable.SHIPDUDE wrote:"HMS Black Joke" probably isn't the best name for modern multicultural Britain!
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
What did the black kid get on his A levels?
Etc, etc.
Nevertheless, I'm sure the hundreds of thousands of black UK citizens would be fine with it!
Etc, etc.
Nevertheless, I'm sure the hundreds of thousands of black UK citizens would be fine with it!
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Well here is my new entry so far. I'm guessing with the weapons systems and have no idea what sensors I need so could anyone help in that regard? I'm also thinking of putting a torpedo tube in the hull opening but I have no idea what kind.
And yes I did go with the Meko inspired idea as whilst the ships don't look sleek they are a good base.
And yes I did go with the Meko inspired idea as whilst the ships don't look sleek they are a good base.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
I think MConrad should be on that credit line... It's a MEKO 360 pixel for pixel with his...
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Yeah I'm going to add him as a credit once I'm further in. I'm just using the cleaned template standard I always use currently. Just need to alter that part before completing it. It's actually a MEKO 360 with Bridge and aft mast structure from the Anzac Class and the underwater hull is a stretched Anzac again.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Fair enough. A point about the design, where you have the goalkeeper atm means you have no access to the hangar. I'd flank CIWS either side like on the actual MEKOs unless you were going to mount something without any penetration up there.denodon wrote:Yeah I'm going to add him as a credit once I'm further in. I'm just using the cleaned template standard I always use currently. Just need to alter that part before completing it. It's actually a MEKO 360 with Bridge and aft mast structure from the Anzac Class and the underwater hull is a stretched Anzac again.
I'm one and I'm fine with it because it's a historic name. Just leave it alone already.SHIPDUDE wrote:What did the black kid get on his A levels?
Etc, etc.
Nevertheless, I'm sure the hundreds of thousands of black UK citizens would be fine with it!
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
Side by side should work if I have the beam (I'd imagine so). I did consider that there might be more beneath the goalkeepers but couldn't think of just how much. I know the 4.5in Mk 8 on the bow needs three decks clearance below at least.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: NATO ASW Design Challenge
GK: about 1,5 deck penetration for the gun, reload room on the deck directly underneath the gun. also, they are way too expensive to have 2 on the hangar next to each other (especially considering this is an ASW ship)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin