Page 12 of 15
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: April 30th, 2018, 6:06 pm
by reytuerto
Excellent drawings! Clever designs! And the antifouling paint of Romana is very nice!
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: April 30th, 2018, 6:17 pm
by Shigure
Alright everyone! The deadline has been reached!
No more entries. The judging process will begin once I have found enough judges. It shouldn't take longer than a day or two.
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: April 30th, 2018, 6:46 pm
by nighthunter
10 days later... Still no decisions
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: April 30th, 2018, 11:26 pm
by JSB
Are you going to list the ships in the first (or last) page especially as some (pepembr_mb) have more than one version to make sure they get marked once?
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: May 1st, 2018, 6:47 am
by Muscatatuck
The more look at it, the more I fall in love with Waritem's 1935 Class, just something about the overall layout draws me in.
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: May 1st, 2018, 8:06 am
by Hood
I must say that this has probably been one of the most successful design challenges we've ever had.
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: May 1st, 2018, 1:08 pm
by MihoshiK
Although Charguizard's French cruisers are so... quintessentially French, I have to say that for sheer practicality, Hood's Lancaster wins out.
Not the biggest, not an attempt to squeeze the last drop out of the treaty, but simply useful ships.
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: May 1st, 2018, 1:15 pm
by Gollevainen
yes I adjoin, this was very nice challenge, and it gives hope we can have equally entertaining ones in the future. Lots of great designs submitted, also nice to see the pro-section of the bucket also participating. I naturally have my own favorites, but i keep my opions to myself
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: May 1st, 2018, 1:19 pm
by erik_t
The challenge for me (full disclosure: I was asked to judge and politely declined) is that I can't wrap my mind around what the treaty-era requirements really were year by year, nation by nation, when I have the benefit of hindsight. Everything I see is through the lens of a US Navy with radar and VT fuzes in the Pacific.
If it doesn't ship at least 8 5/38s, it's dead to me
Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge
Posted: May 1st, 2018, 1:36 pm
by JSB
erik_t wrote: ↑May 1st, 2018, 1:19 pm
The challenge ...... is that I can't wrap my mind around what the treaty-era requirements really were year by year, nation by nation, when I have the benefit of hindsight.....
That's the issue with judging them should we judge,
1- Who will win a surface (in day/night or even AA) fight in 39-45?
2- Or start to take into account date, size and cost as well as what part of LNT (8"/6") they fit into?
Should we also judge drawing and design qualities seperatly or not?