Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
smurf
Posts: 207
Joined: October 25th, 2014, 7:46 pm

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#101 Post by smurf »

As Hood's work provides profiles, I thought these might be of interest.
http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/6660/all2male.jpg
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/8978/allmale.jpg
Krakatoa
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#102 Post by Krakatoa »

Another superbly crafted drawing Hood.

Smurf those drawings are great to show the design process and how they stood against the opposition.
Dmitri97
Posts: 86
Joined: June 10th, 2014, 7:22 pm

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#103 Post by Dmitri97 »

Its always interesting to me how battlecruisers tend to be longer than battleships, I always think the battleships would be the larger, but it is usually the battlecruisers instead.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#104 Post by heuhen »

Dmitri97 wrote:Its always interesting to me how battlecruisers tend to be longer than battleships, I always think the battleships would be the larger, but it is usually the battlecruisers instead.
longer hull more space for bigger machinery and also a mush sleeker hull, gives a higher speed. and Battle-cruiser was a class of ships that was intended to be fast. A battleship was different, they need just enough speed to get from A to B and do there missions, but be compact and powerful. Iowa class and Yamato class is something else tough... they are what you call fast battleship...
Tempest
Posts: 750
Joined: October 21st, 2013, 10:44 am
Location: Wales

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#105 Post by Tempest »

Excellent drawings Hood, love these behemoths.
Dmitri97
Posts: 86
Joined: June 10th, 2014, 7:22 pm

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#106 Post by Dmitri97 »

heuhen wrote:
longer hull more space for bigger machinery and also a mush sleeker hull, gives a higher speed. and Battle-cruiser was a class of ships that was intended to be fast. A battleship was different, they need just enough speed to get from A to B and do there missions, but be compact and powerful. Iowa class and Yamato class is something else tough... they are what you call fast battleship...
Hm interesting, makes sense, weren't several other classes outside the iowas and yamatos considered fast battleships as well?
Karle94
Posts: 2135
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#107 Post by Karle94 »

Indeed. All battleships built from 1921 ish is considered fast battleships, with the exception of the American Colorado class. The QE class is THE first fast battleship.
User avatar
reytuerto
Posts: 1646
Joined: February 21st, 2015, 12:03 am

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#108 Post by reytuerto »

Hi. Also the converted WWI italian dreadnoughts were fast battleships (27.5 kts).
User avatar
Colombamike
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#109 Post by Colombamike »

@ Hood, Smurf, Krataoa
as usual, a little help
Image
Krakatoa
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

#110 Post by Krakatoa »

Thanks Mike, that is a pretty comprehensive list of designs. The most unfortunate thing is that I can not see the two Lillicrap designs I have just done drawings of, which tends to support the fact that they were never meant to be taken seriously. Oh well they have been fun to produce drawings of anyway.
Post Reply